Literature DB >> 22023977

Veterinary students' perceptions of their day-one abilities before and after final-year clinical practice-based training.

Daniel N Schull1, John M Morton, Glen T Coleman, Paul C Mills.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated the impact of final-year clinical practice-based training on veterinary students' perceptions of competence in "Day One" abilities by administering a pre- and post-training self-assessment checklist. This study also investigated the influence of student demographics on their perceptions of satisfaction about their own knowledge and skills and preparedness for practice. Perceptions regarding the usefulness of the checklist as a self-audit tool were also sought. Final year students (N=85) were surveyed on commencement and upon completion of the training using a checklist that had been adapted from the list of essential new-graduate abilities that was developed by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and adopted by the Australasian Veterinary Boards Council. Significant improvements in student perceptions of competence were observed for 38 of the 41 abilities. Students' satisfaction with their knowledge and skill base and their perceptions of preparedness for practice were only weakly correlated with overall perceptions of competence for individual ability items and did not vary significantly with student age, gender, background, intended field and location of work, or with their work experience as veterinary nurses-if any-while studying. Two thirds of students believed that access to the self-assessment checklist on commencement of the training helped them identify areas for improvement before graduation. This article concludes that clinical practice-based training results in considerable improvement in senior veterinary students' perceptions of competence in Day One abilities and that a self-assessment checklist may help students guide their learning. Results from the present study may be useful for veterinary schools as they develop or enhance strategies used for outcomes assessment.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22023977     DOI: 10.3138/jvme.38.3.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Educ        ISSN: 0748-321X            Impact factor:   1.027


  1 in total

1.  Agreement among undergraduate and graduate veterinary students and veterinary anesthesiologists on pain assessment in cats and dogs: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Graeme M Doodnaught; Javier Benito; Beatriz P Monteiro; Guy Beauchamp; Stefania C Grasso; Paulo V Steagall
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.008

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.