Literature DB >> 22023487

Real ear measurement methods for open fit hearing aids: modified pressure concurrent equalization (MPCE) versus modified pressure stored equalization (MPSE).

Hashir Aazh1, Brian C J Moore, Deepak Prasher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess differences between real ear insertion gains (REIG) measured with the modified pressure concurrent equalization (MPCE) and modified pressure stored equalization (MPSE) methods for open fittings in a typical audiology patient population.
DESIGN: REIGs were compared for the two methods using a warble tone sweep at 65 dB SPL. The differences between the two methods at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 kHz were recorded. STUDY SAMPLE: Eighty-three ears of a consecutive sample of 48 candidates for open-fit hearing aids were included.
RESULTS: The mean difference between MPSE and MPCE REIGs was less than 1 dB at all frequencies. Analysis of variance showed that the main effect of method was not significant, and there was no significant interaction between method and frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: The results for the MPSE and MPCE methods did not differ significantly for the patients with mild-to-moderate hearing losses tested here, for whom REIGs were generally less than 20 dB. Further research is needed to identify the REIG values at which the differences between MPCE and MPSE methods become clinically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22023487     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.609182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  3 in total

Review 1.  Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches.

Authors:  Alexandra Winkler; Matthias Latzel; Inga Holube
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Reliability of real ear insertion gain in behind-the-ear hearing aids with different coupling systems to the ear canal.

Authors:  Charlotte Thunberg Jespersen; Kimi Nina Møller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises.

Authors:  Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter; William M Whitmer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.