Literature DB >> 2202239

Deferred consent: use in clinical resuscitation research. Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group.

N S Abramson1, P Safar.   

Abstract

Deferred consent, a new approach to the requirement for informed consent in clinical research, was used in a randomized clinical trial of brain resuscitation after cardiac arrest. Because patients were comatose and therapy had to be initiated immediately, traditional prospective consent usually could not be obtained. Using the deferred consent mechanism, family members were contacted after the first dose of experimental drug or placebo was administered and asked to consent for continued study participation. The vast majority of families were satisfied with the deferred consent mechanism. Their main concerns were about the safety of the experimental drug and whether the active drug or placebo was given. The concepts of randomization, blinding, and placebo-treated controls were generally not well understood. Although our experiences confirmed the impracticality of attempting to obtain traditional prospective consent in clinical resuscitation research, deferred consent was found to be a reasonable solution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2202239     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81703-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  8 in total

Review 1.  The problem of informed consent in emergency medicine research.

Authors:  B A Foëx
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.

Authors:  Lisa Sweet; Dimitrios Adamis; David J Meagher; Daniel Davis; David C Currow; Shirley H Bush; Christopher Barnes; Michael Hartwick; Meera Agar; Jessica Simon; William Breitbart; Neil MacDonald; Peter G Lawlor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Culbert; D J Davis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Witnessed arrest, but not delayed bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves prehospital cardiac arrest survival.

Authors:  R B Vukmir
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Prehospital cardiac arrest outcome is adversely associated with antiarrythmic agent use, but not associated with presenting complaint or medical history.

Authors:  R B Vukmir
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Detailed systematic analysis of recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials in patients with an unscheduled admission to hospital.

Authors:  Ceri Rowlands; Leila Rooshenas; Katherine Fairhurst; Jonathan Rees; Carrol Gamble; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Clinical research without consent in adults in the emergency setting: a review of patient and public views.

Authors:  Jan Lecouturier; Helen Rodgers; Gary A Ford; Tim Rapley; Lynne Stobbart; Stephen J Louw; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.