| Literature DB >> 22022174 |
Young-Sang Kim1, Kwang-Min Kim, Duck-Joo Lee, Bom-Taeck Kim, Sat-Byul Park, Doo-Yeoun Cho, Chang-Hee Suh, Hyoun-Ah Kim, Rae-Woong Park, Nam-Seok Joo.
Abstract
Little is known about hair mineral status in fibromyalgia patients. This study evaluated the characteristics of hair minerals in female patients with fibromyalgia compared with a healthy reference group. Forty-four female patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria were enrolled as the case group. Age and body mass index-matched data were obtained from 122 control subjects enrolled during visit for a regular health check-up. Hair minerals were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The mean age was 43.7 yr. General characteristics were not different between the two groups. Fibromyalgia patients showed a significantly lower level of calcium (775 µg/g vs 1,093 µg/g), magnesium (52 µg/g vs 72 µg/g), iron (5.9 µg/g vs 7.1 µg/g), copper (28.3 µg/g vs 40.2 µg/g) and manganese (140 ng/g vs 190 ng/g). Calcium, magnesium, iron, and manganese were loaded in the same factor using factor analysis; the mean of this factor was significantly lower in fibromyalgia group in multivariate analysis with adjustment for potential confounders. In conclusion, the concentrations of calcium, magnesium, iron, and manganese in the hair of female patients with fibromyalgia are lower than of controls, even after adjustment of potential confounders.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium; Fibromyalgia; Fibromyalgia Syndrome; Magnesium; Trace Minerals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22022174 PMCID: PMC3192333 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
General characteristics of the subjects
All values are expressed mean ± SD or number (proportion). P values are calculated by independent t-test or chi-square test. WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index.
The concentrations of elements between groups
Data shown as mean (95% confidential interval). Logarithmic transformations for calculations back-transformed to natural values. P values are calculated with logarithmically transformed variables by independent sample t-test.
Principal component analysis with varimax rotation for nutritional elements
The differences of factors between the two groups
Data shown as mean ± SD. P values are calculated by independent sample t-test.
The differences of factors with multivariate analysis
Odds ratio (OR) shown as OR (95% confidential interval). P values are calculated by logistic regression analysis. Model 1, without any confounder; Model 2, adjusted for categorized age; Model 3, adjusted for categorized age, categorized WC, alcohol and smoking.