| Literature DB >> 22022046 |
Abstract
The article describes the approach practiced by the author from 1995. Mainly Hansen's patients and lower forearm injuries formed the bulk of these. In Opponen's transfer ECU was used only when others were not available as the wrist developed a tendency to radial deviation even when FCU was acting. PL with palmar aponeurosis as extension was used again in limited cases. The main stay was FDS and EIP. The Guyan's canal and lower end of ulna were the common pulleys. APB and EPL two slip inserts yielded good results. The approach describes the procedure under three distinct headings of choosing motor, Pulley and insert. Varying combinations of these can be used as per requirement.Entities:
Keywords: Opponensplasty; low median paralysis; opponens palsy; tendon transfer for median nerve paralysis
Year: 2011 PMID: 22022046 PMCID: PMC3193648 DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.85357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Plast Surg ISSN: 0970-0358
Figure 1(a) Abd.Pollicis wasted and MCP is flexed by FPB. (b) FPB is also wasted, MCP is extended and IP flexed
Figure 2(a) When FPB is not acting “Crank Handle effect”. Note the index finger on attempted opposition. Collapses the thumb into supination. (b) Normal FPB resulting in good opposition with pronation
Figure 3(a) FPB present and axis of pull should be along mid-axis of APB. (b) Both FPB and APB are paralysed—axis of pull should be between APB and FPB