BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence suggests that nitrogenous bisphosphonates may reduce the risk of developing a first breast cancer and may prevent metastases among breast cancer survivors. However, their impact on risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer is uncertain. METHODS: Within a nested case-control study among women diagnosed with a first primary estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancer at ages 40-79 years, we assessed the association between post-diagnostic bisphosphonate use and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer. We used multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing 351 contralateral breast cancer case subjects with 662 control subjects (ie, breast cancer patients not diagnosed with contralateral breast cancer) who were incidence density-matched on county; race/ethnicity; and age at, year of, and stage at first breast cancer diagnosis. We performed sensitivity analyses with respect to bisphosphonate type and confounding by indication. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Current use of any nitrogenous bisphosphonate and use specifically of alendronate were both associated with reduced risks of contralateral breast cancer compared with never use (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.84 and OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.88, respectively). The risk of contralateral breast cancer further declined with longer durations of bisphosphonate use among current users (P(trend) = .03). Results were similar in analyses restricted to patients with a history of osteoporosis or osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonate use was associated with a substantial reduction in risk of contralateral breast cancer. If this finding is confirmed in additional studies, nitrogenous bisphosphonate therapy may be a feasible approach for contralateral breast cancer risk reduction.
BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence suggests that nitrogenous bisphosphonates may reduce the risk of developing a first breast cancer and may prevent metastases among breast cancer survivors. However, their impact on risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer is uncertain. METHODS: Within a nested case-control study among women diagnosed with a first primary estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancer at ages 40-79 years, we assessed the association between post-diagnostic bisphosphonate use and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer. We used multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing 351 contralateral breast cancer case subjects with 662 control subjects (ie, breast cancerpatients not diagnosed with contralateral breast cancer) who were incidence density-matched on county; race/ethnicity; and age at, year of, and stage at first breast cancer diagnosis. We performed sensitivity analyses with respect to bisphosphonate type and confounding by indication. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Current use of any nitrogenous bisphosphonate and use specifically of alendronate were both associated with reduced risks of contralateral breast cancer compared with never use (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.84 and OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.88, respectively). The risk of contralateral breast cancer further declined with longer durations of bisphosphonate use among current users (P(trend) = .03). Results were similar in analyses restricted to patients with a history of osteoporosis or osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS:Bisphosphonate use was associated with a substantial reduction in risk of contralateral breast cancer. If this finding is confirmed in additional studies, nitrogenous bisphosphonate therapy may be a feasible approach for contralateral breast cancer risk reduction.
Authors: H Eidtmann; R de Boer; N Bundred; A Llombart-Cussac; N Davidson; P Neven; G von Minckwitz; J Miller; N Schenk; R Coleman Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Michael Gnant; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Herbert Stoeger; Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth; Dietmar Heck; Christian Menzel; Raimund Jakesz; Michael Seifert; Michael Hubalek; Gunda Pristauz; Thomas Bauernhofer; Holger Eidtmann; Wolfgang Eiermann; Guenther Steger; Werner Kwasny; Peter Dubsky; Gerhard Hochreiner; Ernst-Pius Forsthuber; Christian Fesl; Richard Greil Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Christopher I Li; Janet R Daling; Peggy L Porter; Mei-Tzu C Tang; Kathleen E Malone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Michael Gnant; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth; Franz Kainberger; Helmut Kässmann; Jutta Claudia Piswanger-Sölkner; Michael Seifert; Ferdinand Ploner; Christian Menzel; Peter Dubsky; Florian Fitzal; Vesna Bjelic-Radisic; Günther Steger; Richard Greil; Christian Marth; Ernst Kubista; Hellmut Samonigg; Peter Wohlmuth; Martina Mittlböck; Raimund Jakesz Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-08-19 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Larissa A Korde; David R Doody; Li Hsu; Peggy L Porter; Kathleen E Malone Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Christopher I Li; Meghan R Flanagan; Mei-Tzu C Tang; Peggy L Porter; Kathleen E Malone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Polly A Newcomb; Michael N Passarelli; Amanda I Phipps; Garnet L Anderson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Gloria Y F Ho; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Rowan T Chlebowski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anandi Sawant; Jessy Deshane; Joel Jules; Carnella M Lee; Brittney A Harris; Xu Feng; Selvarangan Ponnazhagan Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 12.701