Literature DB >> 22021517

Role of ultrasound diagnosis in assessing and managing thyroid nodules with inadequate cytology.

Dong Wook Kim1, Eun Joo Lee, Jun Hyung Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a specific ultrasound classification system in evaluating thyroid nodules with inadequate cytology, defined as a cytologic result that shows insufficient cellularity and does not provide useful information. Ultrasound diagnoses were made in accordance with a specially devised ultrasound classification system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2009, 1036 patients with 1289 thyroid nodules (largest diameter ≥ 5 mm) diagnosed by ultrasound and subsequent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) were enrolled in the study. Each thyroid nodule was prospectively classified on the basis of its ultrasound features by a single radiologist into one of five diagnostic categories: benign, probably benign, borderline, possibly malignant, or malignant. Solid nodules were classified using all five categories, whereas partially cystic thyroid nodules were classified using four (borderline was omitted). Repeated ultrasound-guided FNA was performed on all nodules for which the initial ultrasound-guided FNA revealed inadequate cytology.
RESULTS: Of 96 nodules with inadequate cytology (96/1289, 7.4%), 22 were surgically removed, and the ultrasound diagnoses and cytopathology results of all 96 were compared. A borderline ultrasound diagnosis was assigned to 13 nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated for all nodules excluding all the borderline nodules (100%, 95.1%, 33.3%, 100%, and 95.2%, respectively) and with four borderline nodules reclassified as benign (100%, 95.3%, 33.3%, 100%, and 95.4%, respectively). The values obtained with these approaches were not significantly different (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The selective use of repeated ultrasound-guided FNA for nodules with initial inadequate cytology may be preferable to its unconditional use depending on the ultrasound diagnoses of thyroid nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22021517     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  2 in total

1.  Can ultrasound be as a surrogate marker for diagnosing a papillary thyroid cancer? Comparison with BRAF mutation analysis.

Authors:  Jae Young Seo; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jung Hwan Baek; Jung Hee Shin; Kyung Hwa Han; Jin Young Kwak
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  Do Ultrasound Patterns and Clinical Parameters Inform the Probability of Thyroid Cancer Predicted by Molecular Testing in Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology?

Authors:  James J Figge; William E Gooding; David L Steward; Linwah Yip; Rebecca S Sippel; Samantha Peiling Yang; Randall P Scheri; Jennifer A Sipos; Susan J Mandel; Sarah E Mayson; Kenneth D Burman; Jessica M Folek; Bryan R Haugen; Julie A Sosa; Rajeev Parameswaran; Wee Boon Tan; Yuri E Nikiforov; Sally E Carty
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 6.568

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.