Literature DB >> 22020590

Factors associated with early magnetic resonance imaging utilization for acute occupational low back pain: a population-based study from Washington State workers' compensation.

Janessa M Graves1, Deborah Fulton-Kehoe, Diane P Martin, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Gary M Franklin.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A population-based, prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify demographic, job-related, psychosocial, and clinical factors associated with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 6 weeks from injury (early MRI) among workers' compensation claimants with acute occupational low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Early MRI may be associated with increased use of services for treatment and costs. To understand utilization and most appropriately apply guidelines, it is important to identify factors associated with early imaging use for occupational LBP.
METHODS: Workers (N = 1830) were interviewed 3 weeks (median) after submitting a workers' compensation claim for a back injury. Demographic, work, health, clinical, and injury characteristics were ascertained from interviews, medical records, and administrative data. Modified Poisson regression analyses identified factors associated with early MRI use.
RESULTS: Among respondents, 362 (19.8%) received an early MRI. Multivariable regression showed that male workers were 43% more likely to receive an early MRI than female workers (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.82). Initial visit type with a surgeon was associated with 78% greater likelihood of receiving an early MRI than that with a primary care physician (IRR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.08-2.92). Having a chiropractor as the initial provider was associated with a reduced likelihood of early MRI (IRR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42-0.66). Workers with elevated work fear-avoidance, higher Roland scores, or increased injury severity were more likely to receive early MRI than counterparts with lower levels or scores.
CONCLUSION: Nearly 20% of the injured workers with LBP receive early MRI, a rate similar to that reported elsewhere. Early MRI may lead to greater subsequent interventions, potentially poorer outcomes, and increased health care expenditures. On the basis of the characteristics of patients with uncomplicated occupational LBP, providers may be able to provide tailored care, and providers and policy makers may better understand the utilization of imaging and adherence to clinical guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22020590     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823a03cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  The effects of quality of care on costs: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; José J Escarce; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Early predictors of lumbar spine surgery after occupational back injury: results from a prospective study of workers in Washington State.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Judith A Turner; Thomas M Wickizer; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Guideline-concordant utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in adults receiving chiropractic manipulative therapy vs other care for radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robert J Trager; Brian R Anderson; Regina M Casselberry; Jaime A Perez; Jeffery A Dusek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Health care utilization and costs associated with adherence to clinical practice guidelines for early magnetic resonance imaging among workers with acute occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Janessa M Graves; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Study protocol: the Back Pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) registry.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Bryan A Comstock; Brian W Bresnahan; Srdjan S Nedeljkovic; David R Nerenz; Zoya Bauer; Andrew L Avins; Kathryn James; Judith A Turner; Patrick Heagerty; Larry Kessler; Janna L Friedly; Sean D Sullivan; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Ten Important Tips in Treating a Patient with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Hamid Hejrati; Shahrara Ariamanesh
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-10-17

7.  Does changed referral options affect the use of MRI for patients with low back pain? Evidence from a natural experiment using nationwide data.

Authors:  Morten Sall Jensen; Kim Rose Olsen; Lars Morsø; Jens Søndergaard; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The Use of Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Eastern China: Appropriateness and Related Factors.

Authors:  Liedao Yu; Xuanwei Wang; Xiangjin Lin; Yue Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.