Literature DB >> 22020106

Negative feedback through mRNA provides the best control of gene-expression noise.

Abhyudai Singh1.   

Abstract

Genetically identical cell populations exposed to the same environment can exhibit considerable cell-to-cell variation in the levels of specific proteins. This variation or expression noise arises from the inherent stochastic nature of biochemical reactions that constitute gene expression. Negative feedback loops are common motifs in gene networks that reduce expression noise and intercellular variability in protein levels. Using stochastic models of gene expression we here compare different feedback architectures in their ability to reduce stochasticity in protein levels. A mathematically controlled comparison shows that in physiologically relevant parameter regimes, feedback regulation through the mRNA provides the best suppression of expression noise. Consistent with our theoretical results we find negative feedback loops though the mRNA in essential eukaryotic genes, where feedback is mediated via intron-derived microRNAs. Finally, we find that contrary to previous results, protein-mediated translational regulation may not always provide significantly better noise suppression than protein-mediated transcriptional regulation.
© 2011 IEEE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22020106     DOI: 10.1109/TNB.2011.2168826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience        ISSN: 1536-1241            Impact factor:   2.935


  19 in total

1.  Synthetic negative feedback circuits using engineered small RNAs.

Authors:  Ciarán L Kelly; Andreas W K Harris; Harrison Steel; Edward J Hancock; John T Heap; Antonis Papachristodoulou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Consequences of mRNA transport on stochastic variability in protein levels.

Authors:  Abhyudai Singh; Pavol Bokes
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Control theory meets synthetic biology.

Authors:  Domitilla Del Vecchio; Aaron J Dy; Yili Qian
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Gene expression noise is affected differentially by feedback in burst frequency and burst size.

Authors:  Pavol Bokes; Abhyudai Singh
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Double-edged role of resource competition in gene expression noise and control.

Authors:  Hanah Goetz; Austin Stone; Rong Zhang; Ying-Cheng Lai; Xiao-Jun Tian
Journal:  Adv Genet (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 6.  Control by a hair's breadth: the role of microRNAs in the skin.

Authors:  Matthew S Ning; Thomas Andl
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Adaptive noise.

Authors:  Mark Viney; Sarah E Reece
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  MiRNAs confer phenotypic robustness to gene networks by suppressing biological noise.

Authors:  Velia Siciliano; Immacolata Garzilli; Chiara Fracassi; Stefania Criscuolo; Simona Ventre; Diego di Bernardo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Quantifying intrinsic and extrinsic variability in stochastic gene expression models.

Authors:  Abhyudai Singh; Mohammad Soltani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The magnitude and colour of noise in genetic negative feedback systems.

Authors:  Margaritis Voliotis; Clive G Bowsher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.