Ilse Storm1, Marie-Jeanne Aarts, Janneke Harting, Albertine J Schuit. 1. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Public Health and Health Services Division, Centre for Public Health Forecasting, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. ilse.storm@rivm.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In the last few years the Dutch ministry of Health has been searching for a renewed Health in All Policies (HiAP) strategy. This study analyses the Dutch practices and explores opportunities to reduce health inequalities by HiAP. METHODS: A qualitative screening on the Dutch national budget was performed to explore ongoing policy resolutions of ministries inside and outside the public health domain. Additionally, semi-structured (group) interviews were conducted with 19 policy officers of seven ministries to identify critical factors for intersectoral collaboration. RESULTS: Using the Dutch model on health inequalities 38 policy resolutions were selected: 15 on improving the socioeconomic position of people; four on improving participation of people with health problems; 19 on improving living and working conditions and lifestyle; and four on accessibility and quality of care. To improve intersectoral collaboration, policy officers suggested to strengthen existing links between the ministries, create common interest of objectives as well as visible results, approach this theme in a coordinated way, and to achieve broad political agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The main challenges for a formal HiAP strategy are to (a) cover the determinants of health inequalities in a balanced way linked to concrete objectives and visible results, (b) enhance high level agreement and coordinated mechanisms from the government in general and the ministry of Health in particular. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVES: In the last few years the Dutch ministry of Health has been searching for a renewed Health in All Policies (HiAP) strategy. This study analyses the Dutch practices and explores opportunities to reduce health inequalities by HiAP. METHODS: A qualitative screening on the Dutch national budget was performed to explore ongoing policy resolutions of ministries inside and outside the public health domain. Additionally, semi-structured (group) interviews were conducted with 19 policy officers of seven ministries to identify critical factors for intersectoral collaboration. RESULTS: Using the Dutch model on health inequalities 38 policy resolutions were selected: 15 on improving the socioeconomic position of people; four on improving participation of people with health problems; 19 on improving living and working conditions and lifestyle; and four on accessibility and quality of care. To improve intersectoral collaboration, policy officers suggested to strengthen existing links between the ministries, create common interest of objectives as well as visible results, approach this theme in a coordinated way, and to achieve broad political agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The main challenges for a formal HiAP strategy are to (a) cover the determinants of health inequalities in a balanced way linked to concrete objectives and visible results, (b) enhance high level agreement and coordinated mechanisms from the government in general and the ministry of Health in particular. Copyright Â
Authors: Annemarie Wagemakers; Lisanne S Mulderij; Kirsten T Verkooijen; Stef Groenewoud; Maria A Koelen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Anna-Marie Hendriks; Jolanda M Habraken; Stef P J Kremers; Maria W J Jansen; Hans van Oers; Albertine J Schuit Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 3.411