Literature DB >> 22019251

Performance of an alternative laboratory-based algorithm for HIV diagnosis in a high-risk population.

Kevin P Delaney1, James D Heffelfinger, Laura G Wesolowski, S Michele Owen, William A Meyer, Susan Kennedy, Apurva Uniyal, Peter R Kerndt, Bernard M Branson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An immunoassay (IA) followed by Western blot (WB) or immunofluorescence assay has been the primary algorithm used to provide laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis of HIV infection in the US for more than 20 years. Recently, an alternative diagnostic algorithm was proposed to more accurately identify early HIV-1 infection and differentiate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate a sequential alternative algorithm in which reactive IAs are followed by a rapid HIV test and, if negative, a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). STUDY
DESIGN: Specimens from high-risk persons were tested with 4 HIV IAs, 6 rapid HIV tests and NAAT (APTIMA(®)), which are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. IAs were repeated in duplicate if specimen volumes were sufficient. The performance of the alternative algorithm was compared to HIV WB and NAAT.
RESULTS: The original study classified 377 specimens as HIV-positive and 3070 as HIV-negative. All 4 IAs correctly identified >99.5% of HIV-positive specimens and, on initial screening, >95.8% of HIV-negative specimens. When repeated, specificity of IAs improved to >99%. Between 6.7% and 12.4% of IA-repeatedly reactive specimens required APTIMA for resolution. The alternative algorithm led to the correct classification of all IA-reactive specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of screening IA and rapid test used, the alternative algorithm correctly classified the infection status of all persons with reactive screening IA results. Few specimens required NAAT for resolution, and the proportion requiring NAAT was lower when repeat IA test results were considered. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019251     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  5 in total

1.  Use of rapid HIV assays as supplemental tests in specimens with repeatedly reactive screening immunoassay results not confirmed by HIV-1 Western blot.

Authors:  Laura G Wesolowski; Kevin P Delaney; William A Meyer; Amy J Blatt; Berry Bennett; Pollyanna Chavez; Timothy C Granade; Michele Owen
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Comparison of enhanced targeted rapid HIV screening using the Denver HIV risk score to nontargeted rapid HIV screening in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jason S Haukoos; Emily Hopkins; Brooke Bender; Comilla Sasson; Alia A Al-Tayyib; Mark W Thrun
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Acute infections, cost and time to reporting of HIV test results in three U.S. State Public Health Laboratories.

Authors:  Muazzam Nasrullah; Laura G Wesolowski; Steven F Ethridge; Kevin Cranston; Michael Pentella; Robert A Myers; James T Rudrik; Angela B Hutchinson; Spencer B Bennett; Barbara G Werner
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 6.072

4.  Performance of a fourth-generation HIV screening assay and an alternative HIV diagnostic testing algorithm.

Authors:  Muazzam Nasrullah; Laura G Wesolowski; William A Meyer; S Michele Owen; Silvina Masciotra; Craig Vorwald; William J Becker; Bernard M Branson
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Performance of an Alternative Laboratory-Based HIV Diagnostic Testing Algorithm Using HIV-1 RNA Viral Load.

Authors:  Marc A Pitasi; Shilpa N Patel; Laura G Wesolowski; Silvina Masciotra; Wei Luo; S Michele Owen; Kevin P Delaney
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.868

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.