OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a visual tool to assist parents in assessing healing after surgical circumcision or revision circumcision (SCRC). METHODS: Among children undergoing SCRC, photographs were taken on postoperative days 0-1-2-3-5-7-10-14-21, and compiled into an atlas. Atlas utility was assessed during two 1-month periods. During the first period (M1) families received routine postoperative instructions only; during the second period (M2), families received the atlas in addition to routine instructions. Families were surveyed by phone and calls/contacts were tracked. RESULTS: 33 families (among 83 SCRCs) were surveyed during M1, vs 39 families (among 77 SCRCs) during M2 (p = 0.17). Nearly all reported the atlas helpful (59% very helpful, 27% moderately helpful, 9% somewhat helpful). All but one family used the atlas. There was a trend toward families receiving the atlas being more comfortable (64% vs 82% very comfortable, p = 0.12). Survey scores were similar between M1 and M2 for total score, satisfaction, and the number whose expectations were met (58% vs 55%, p = 0.21). Phone contacts decreased between M1 and M2, both in absolute number (M1 = 24 calls vs M2 = 12 calls), and as a proportion of total cases performed (29% vs 16%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The circumcision atlas was well received by families and was associated with a significant decrease in post-surgical telephone calls. The atlas has been put into routine clinical use with excellent response.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a visual tool to assist parents in assessing healing after surgical circumcision or revision circumcision (SCRC). METHODS: Among children undergoing SCRC, photographs were taken on postoperative days 0-1-2-3-5-7-10-14-21, and compiled into an atlas. Atlas utility was assessed during two 1-month periods. During the first period (M1) families received routine postoperative instructions only; during the second period (M2), families received the atlas in addition to routine instructions. Families were surveyed by phone and calls/contacts were tracked. RESULTS: 33 families (among 83 SCRCs) were surveyed during M1, vs 39 families (among 77 SCRCs) during M2 (p = 0.17). Nearly all reported the atlas helpful (59% very helpful, 27% moderately helpful, 9% somewhat helpful). All but one family used the atlas. There was a trend toward families receiving the atlas being more comfortable (64% vs 82% very comfortable, p = 0.12). Survey scores were similar between M1 and M2 for total score, satisfaction, and the number whose expectations were met (58% vs 55%, p = 0.21). Phone contacts decreased between M1 and M2, both in absolute number (M1 = 24 calls vs M2 = 12 calls), and as a proportion of total cases performed (29% vs 16%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The circumcision atlas was well received by families and was associated with a significant decrease in post-surgical telephone calls. The atlas has been put into routine clinical use with excellent response.
Authors: Michael E Chua; Megan A Saunders; Paul R Bowlin; Jessica M Ming; Roberto Iglesias Lopes; Walid A Farhat; Joana Dos Santos Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 1.862