Literature DB >> 22018821

A comparison of results using nasoalveolar moulding in cleft infants treated within 1 month of life versus those treated after this period: development of a new protocol.

V Shetty1, H J Vyas, S M Sharma, H F Sailer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The objectives of this study were to: evaluate the effects of nasoalveolar moulding (NAM) in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate infants presenting for treatment at different ages; propose a new NAM protocol in these patients; improve the predictability of NAM. Study groups comprised: group I (n=15) treated with NAM within 1 month of age; group II (n=15) treated with NAM between 1 and 5 months of age. CONTROL: group III (n=15) comprised of non-cleft 18-month old children. A standard protocol was followed. Patients were evaluated before initiation of NAM, before cheiloplasty and at 18 months. 7 linear anthropometric measurements were compared using dento-facial models. Statistical analysis before and after NAM revealed that group I patients demonstrated 81%, 198%, 69% and 145% improvement in intersegment distance, nasal height, nasal dome height and columella height respectively; whilst group II patients demonstrated 51%, 33%, 21% and 38% improvement for the same. At 18 months, group I patients closely resembled group III patients. This study concluded that the effects of NAM were most significant in group I. Group II patients also benefited from NAM, although to a lesser extent. This study validates the use of NAM in infants presenting late for treatment.
Copyright © 2011 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018821     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pre surgical nasoalveolar molding: changing paradigms in early cleft lip and palate rehabilitation.

Authors:  Prashanth Sadashiva Murthy; Seema Deshmukh; A Bhagyalakshmi; Kt Srilatha
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-04

2.  Nasal outcomes of presurgical nasal molding in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Emily M Williams; Carla A Evans; David J Reisberg; Ellen A Begole
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-09-11

Review 3.  Management of the premaxilla in the treatment of bilateral cleft of lip and palate: what can the literature tell us?

Authors:  Gerhard K P Bittermann; Ad P de Ruiter; Nard G Janssen; Arnold J N Bittermann; Aebele M van der Molen; Robert J J van Es; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; R Koole
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Correlation between Nasoalveolar Molding and Surgical, Aesthetic, Functional and Socioeconomic Outcomes Following Primary Repair Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sophie Maillard; Jean-Marc Retrouvey; Mairaj K Ahmed; Peter J Taub
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-09-30

Review 5.  Presurgical cleft lip and palate orthopedics: an overview.

Authors:  Ibtesam Alzain; Waeil Batwa; Alex Cash; Zuhair A Murshid
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2017-05-31

6.  Comparative evaluation of nasal and alveolar changes in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using intraoral and extraoral nasoalveolar molding techniques: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ritesh Kalaskar; Priyanka Bhaje; Priyanka Sharma; Shruti Balasubramanian; Nupur Ninawe; Rajesh Ijalkar
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-08-31

7.  The role of Nasoalveolar molding: A 3D Prospective analysis.

Authors:  Pang-Yun Chou; Rami R Hallac; Tochi Ajiwe; Xian-Jin Xie; Yu-Fang Liao; Alex A Kane; Yong Jong Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.