Literature DB >> 22018044

Medical research results in the general media: worthwhile and rewarding if presented well, potentially harmful if prepared poorly.

Peter D Sly1, Paul L P Brand.   

Abstract

There are a number of advantages to communicating research results via the general media, including: fulfilling the obligation imposed by publicly-funded research to return research results to the public; enhancing the reputation of the individual researcher and of their institution in their community; and acting as an advocate for the research areas of interest. The choice of media outlet depends on the nature and importance of the results to be communicated. Individual researchers, especially early in their career, need adequate support from appropriately trained staff in dealing with the media. However, if done correctly, dealing with the media can be a worthwhile and rewarding experience. Before contacting the press, it is important that researchers decide on their key message to be conveyed, define any area of their research they do not wish to discuss in public, and prepare answers to the most likely questions the journalist may ask.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018044     DOI: 10.1016/j.prrv.2011.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev        ISSN: 1526-0542            Impact factor:   2.726


  1 in total

1.  Impact of Psychiatric Information on Potential Jurors in Evaluating High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder (hfASD).

Authors:  Colleen M Berryessa; Lauren C Milner; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2015-05-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.