Literature DB >> 22017968

A double-blind randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of topical lidocaine in extended flexible endoscopic nasal examinations.

J P Bonaparte1, H Javidnia, S Kilty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that using lidocaine nasal spray will result in improved pain and comfort outcomes during an extended flexible endoscopic nasal examination.
DESIGN: A split-body, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. After receiving a rinse of oral mouthwash (Listerine(®)), patients were randomised to receive placebo in one nasal cavity and 30 mg of topical lidocaine in the other.
SETTING: A tertiary care centre outpatient Otolaryngology clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two patients who required an extended bilateral flexible endoscopic nasal examination. An extended nasal examination consisted of an examination of a minimum of two osteomeatal regions on each side of the nasal cavity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discomfort and pain were assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Our study utilised the definition of pain based on International Association for the Study of Pain. Pain was defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Discomfort was defined as the overall unpleasant experience of the procedure. This included all aspects of the examination such as the pain or other negative sensations associated with the examination, any side effects associated with the application of the nasal sprays as well as any anxiety associated with the examination. A Wilcoxon sign-rank test was used for the primary outcome measures.
RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in discomfort scores on the treatment side of the nasal cavity compared with the control side (median VAS score of 18.6 mm versus 44.6 mm; P = 0.01). The change in pain between the treatment side compared with the control side did not reach our definition of statistical significance (5.1 mm versus 9.2 mm; P = 0.05). Patients with an active or uncontrolled inflammatory disorder of the nasal cavity experienced a significantly greater reduction in pain compared to those without an inflammatory condition (median change of the VAS score, -15.6 versus +1.0; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: After a rinse with oral mouthwash, the use of lidocaine results in a significant reduction in the discomfort associated with an extended bilateral flexible endoscopic nasal examination. Patients undergoing such an examination would benefit from the application of lidocaine after masking the negative flavour using oral mouthwash.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22017968     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02403.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  7 in total

Review 1.  Topical anesthetic preparations for rigid and flexible endoscopy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Se Hwan Hwang; Chan-Soon Park; Byung Guk Kim; Jin Hee Cho; Jun Myung Kang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement.

Authors:  Marek L Kowalski; Ignacio Ansotegui; Werner Aberer; Mona Al-Ahmad; Mubeccel Akdis; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Kirsten Beyer; Miguel Blanca; Simon Brown; Chaweewan Bunnag; Arnaldo Capriles Hulett; Mariana Castells; Hiok Hee Chng; Frederic De Blay; Motohiro Ebisawa; Stanley Fineman; David B K Golden; Tari Haahtela; Michael Kaliner; Connie Katelaris; Bee Wah Lee; Joanna Makowska; Ulrich Muller; Joaquim Mullol; John Oppenheimer; Hae-Sim Park; James Parkerson; Giovanni Passalacqua; Ruby Pawankar; Harald Renz; Franziska Rueff; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Joaquin Sastre; Glenis Scadding; Scott Sicherer; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; James Tracy; Vera van Kempen; Barbara Bohle; G Walter Canonica; Luis Caraballo; Maximiliano Gomez; Komei Ito; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Mark Larche; Giovanni Melioli; Lars K Poulsen; Rudolf Valenta; Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.084

3.  Effects of topical nasal anesthetic on fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST).

Authors:  Erin E Kamarunas; Gary H McCullough; Tiffany J Guidry; Mark Mennemeier; Keith Schluterman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  A randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of co-phenylcaine nasal spray in flexible transnasal pharyngolaryngoscopy.

Authors:  F Javed; A Parmar; A Hussain; D Hajioff; D Pinder
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Decision aid and preference assessment of topical anesthesia for otolaryngology procedures.

Authors:  Elliana K DeVore; Stacey T Gray; Molly N Huston; Phillip C Song; Blake C Alkire; Matthew R Naunheim
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-25

6.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Bryan Chung; Roberta W Scherer; Diana Elbourne; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-06-30

7.  Premedication Methods in Nasal Endoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Authors:  Mehmet İlhan Şahin; Kerem Kökoğlu; Şafak Güleç; İbrahim Ketenci; Yaşar Ünlü
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.