Literature DB >> 22017930

Assessing the temporal course of neointimal hyperplasia formation after different generations of drug-eluting stents.

Carlos A Collet1, J Ribamar Costa, Alexandre Abizaid, Daniel Chamié, Rodolfo Staico, Ricardo Costa, Dimytri Siquera, Javier Obregon, Fausto Feres, Amanda Sousa, Jose Eduardo Sousa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the temporal course of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) formation following implantation of 2 different generations of drug-eluting stents (DES).
BACKGROUND: The amount of NIH following DES implantation correlates with the potency of the antiproliferative drug, its kinetic release, as well as some individual characteristics, as the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). Recently, some publications have suggested a continuous growth of NIH following DES, which in some cases, might result in late "catch-up."
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with single, de novo lesions were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) (n = 12) and biolimus-eluting stents (BES) (n = 13) and underwent intravascular ultrasound evaluation immediately after the procedure and at 9-month and 5-year follow-ups. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the percentage of NIH obstruction between mid- and long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean age was 59 years and 28% of patients had DM. Overall, the percentage of NIH obstruction significantly increased from 9 months to 5 years (1.3% at first follow-up vs. 4.8% at second follow-up, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the variation of vessel volume (Δ = -0.70 mm(3)/mm BES vs. Δ = 0.18 mm(3)/mm SES, p = 0.56), lumen volume (Δ = 0.40 mm(3)/mm BES vs. Δ = -0.05 mm(3)/mm SES, p = 0.71), and percentage of NIH obstruction (Δ = 3.0% BES vs. Δ = 3.8% SES, p = 0.55) among DES. However, diabetic patients had a marked NIH increase along the years (NIH volume at second follow-up: 10.15 mm(3) DM vs. 5.11 mm(3) non-DM, p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: The present serial intravascular ultrasound assessment supports the occurrence of continuous NIH growth following different generations of DES. These findings seem to be particularly more pronounced among patients with DM.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22017930     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  4 in total

1.  Relative resistance to Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition in vascular smooth muscle cells of diabetic donors.

Authors:  Daniel J Lightell; T Cooper Woods
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Current Management of In-Stent Restenosis.

Authors:  Ae Young Her; Eun Seok Shin
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 3.  Contemporary Management of Stent Failure: Part One.

Authors:  Nikhil Pal; Jehangir Din; Peter O'Kane
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-02

Review 4.  Stent evaluation with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Seung-Yul Lee; Myeong-Ki Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.