| Literature DB >> 22017747 |
George Prpich1, Jens Evans, Phil Irving, Jérôme Dagonneau, James Hutchinson, Sophie Rocks, Edgar Black, Simon J T Pollard.
Abstract
Policy makers and regulators are charged with the daunting task of comparing incommensurate environmental risks to inform strategic decisions on interventions. Here we present a policy-level framework intended to support strategic decision processes concerning environmental risks within the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). The framework provides the structure by which risk-based evidence may be collated and by assessing the value of harm expressed by different environmental policy areas against a consistent objective (e.g., sustainable development), we begin to form a basis for relative comparison. This research integrates the prior art, examples of best practice, and intimate end-user input to build a qualitative assessment informed by expert judgment. Supported by contextual narratives, the framework has proven successful in securing organizational support and stimulating debate about proportionate mitigation activity, resource allocation, and shifts in current risk thinking.Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22017747 DOI: 10.1021/es201145a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028