Literature DB >> 22017732

Outcomes in patients with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer: relation to preoperative PSA level.

Barry B McGuire1, Brian T Helfand, Stacy Loeb, Qiaoyan Hu, Daniel O'Brien, Phillip Cooper, Ximing Yang, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? High-grade prostate cancers are associated with poor disease-specific outcomes. A proportion of these tumours produce little PSA. This study demonstrates that among Gleason 8-10 prostate cancers, some of the worst survival outcomes are associated with the lowest PSA levels.
OBJECTIVE: • To assess outcomes of patients with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer (CaP) with a low (≤ 2.5 ng/mL) vs higher preoperative serum PSA levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • From 1983 to 2003, 5544 patients underwent open radical prostatectomy, of whom 354 had a Gleason 8-10 tumour in the prostatectomy specimen. • Patients were stratified according to preoperative PSA level into four strata: ≤ 2.5 ng/mL (n= 31), 2.6-4 ng/mL (n= 31), 4.1-10 ng/mL (n= 174), and >10 ng/mL (n= 118). • We compared biochemical progression-free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) as a function of preoperative PSA level.
RESULTS:Patients with PSA level ≤ 2.5 ng/mL were more likely to have seminal vesicle invasion (P= 0.003). • On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, patients with a PSA level ≤ 2.5 ng/mL had proportionately worse outcomes than their counterparts with higher PSA levels. • The 7-year PFS in the PSA ≤ 2.5 ng/mL stratum was lower than those of the PSA 2.6-4 ng/mL and 4-10 ng/mL strata (36% vs 50 and 42%, respectively); however, the lowest 7-year PFS was found in those with a PSA level >10 ng/mL (32%, P= 0.02). • Gleason score 8-10 tumours with a PSA level ≤ 2.5 ng/mL also tended to have the lowest 7-year MFS (75, 93, 89 and 92% for PSA level ≤ 2.5, 2.6-4, 4.1-10 and >10 ng/mL, respectively, P= 0.2) and CSS (81, 100, 94 and 90% for PSA level ≤ 2.5, 2.6-4, 4.1-10 and >10 ng/mL, respectively, P= 0.3), although these differences were not statistically significant. • In the subset with palpable disease, Gleason grade 8-10 disease with PSA level ≤ 2.5 ng/mL also was associated with a worse prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: • In patients with Gleason grade 8-10 disease, a proportion of these tumours are so poorly differentiated that they produce relatively little PSA. • Patients with high-grade, low-PSA tumours had less favourable outcomes than many of those with higher PSA levels.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22017732     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10628.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to avoid treatment-induced lineage crisis in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guilhem Roubaud; Bobby C Liaw; William K Oh; David J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Selenium, nickel, and calcium levels in cancerous and non-cancerous prostate tissue samples and their relation with some parameters.

Authors:  İlker Çelen; Talha Müezzinoğlu; O Yavuz Ataman; Sezgin Bakırdere; Mehmet Korkmaz; Nalan Neşe; Feriye Şenol; Murat Lekili
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Personalized prostate specific antigen testing using genetic variants may reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; Stacy Loeb; Qiaoyan Hu; Phillip R Cooper; Kimberly A Roehl; Barry B McGuire; Nikola A Baumann; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Androgen receptor and immune inflammation in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kouji Izumi; Lei Li; Chawnshang Chang
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 5.  Current approaches, challenges and future directions for monitoring treatment response in prostate cancer.

Authors:  T J Wallace; T Torre; M Grob; J Yu; I Avital; Bldm Brücher; A Stojadinovic; Y G Man
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Prostate cancer-specific death in brachytherapy treated high-risk patients stratified by pre-treatment PSA.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Robert W Galbreath; Wayne M Butler; Ryan Fiano; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-08-30

7.  AKR1C3 overexpression may serve as a promising biomarker for prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Yuantong Tian; Lijing Zhao; Haitao Zhang; Xichun Liu; Lijuan Zhao; Xuejian Zhao; Yi Li; Jing Li
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Reduction in expression of the benign AR transcriptome is a hallmark of localised prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Ryan Stuchbery; Geoff Macintyre; Marek Cmero; Laurence M Harewood; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello; Christopher M Hovens; Niall M Corcoran
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24

9.  Incidence of metastasis and prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis in Gleason 3+4 versus 4+3 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed H Kamel; Mahmoud I Khalil; Wilson M Alobuia; Joseph Su; Rodney Davis
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lamont J Wilkins; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Dominic Grimberg; Eric A Klein; Brian F Chapin; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.