BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency (RF) ablation following intra-arterial iodized-oil injection for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) invisible on ultrasonographic (US) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was waived for this retrospective study approved by our institutional review board. Sixty-seven consecutive patients with 150 HCCs (mean diameter 1.3 ± 0.6 cm; range 0.5-4.2 cm) received 90 RF sessions following intra-arterial iodized-oil injection. Each patient had at least one HCC invisible on US images. Computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided RF ablation was performed within 1 week after the injection of iodized oil from feeding arteries of each tumor. Technical success was defined as a planned electrode placement and completion of ablation protocol. Technical success, complications, changes in liver function, local tumor progression, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: All HCCs became visible on CT fluoroscopy after iodized-oil injection, and RF ablation was technically successful in all sessions (technical success rate, 100%, 90/90). Major complications occurred in 6 RF sessions (6.7%, 6/90), including hemorrhage (2.2%, 2/90), portal thrombosis (2.2%, 2/90), and pneumothorax (2.2%, 2/90). No significant deterioration in Child-Pugh score was found. The mean follow-up period was 23.2 ± 18.0 months. The cumulative local tumor progression rates and overall survival rates were, respectively, 3.9 and 82.7% at 1 year, 5.3 and 45.3% at 3 years, and 5.3 and 26.4% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy-guided RF ablation following intra-arterial iodized-oil injection is a feasible, safe, and useful therapeutic option for HCCs invisible on US images.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency (RF) ablation following intra-arterial iodized-oil injection for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) invisible on ultrasonographic (US) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was waived for this retrospective study approved by our institutional review board. Sixty-seven consecutive patients with 150 HCCs (mean diameter 1.3 ± 0.6 cm; range 0.5-4.2 cm) received 90 RF sessions following intra-arterial iodized-oil injection. Each patient had at least one HCC invisible on US images. Computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided RF ablation was performed within 1 week after the injection of iodized oil from feeding arteries of each tumor. Technical success was defined as a planned electrode placement and completion of ablation protocol. Technical success, complications, changes in liver function, local tumor progression, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: All HCCs became visible on CT fluoroscopy after iodized-oil injection, and RF ablation was technically successful in all sessions (technical success rate, 100%, 90/90). Major complications occurred in 6 RF sessions (6.7%, 6/90), including hemorrhage (2.2%, 2/90), portal thrombosis (2.2%, 2/90), and pneumothorax (2.2%, 2/90). No significant deterioration in Child-Pugh score was found. The mean follow-up period was 23.2 ± 18.0 months. The cumulative local tumor progression rates and overall survival rates were, respectively, 3.9 and 82.7% at 1 year, 5.3 and 45.3% at 3 years, and 5.3 and 26.4% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy-guided RF ablation following intra-arterial iodized-oil injection is a feasible, safe, and useful therapeutic option for HCCs invisible on US images.
Authors: J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tito Livraghi; Luigi Solbiati; M Franca Meloni; G Scott Gazelle; Elkan F Halpern; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Robert M Pohlman; James L Hinshaw; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Meghan G Lubner; Shane A Wells; Fred T Lee; Marci L Alexander; Kelly L Wergin; Tomy Varghese Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2021-05-16 Impact factor: 3.694