BACKGROUND: There is a known association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and atrial fibrillation (AF); however, how OSA affects the atrial myocardium is not well described. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with OSA have an abnormal atrial substrate. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing ablation of paroxysmal AF and in sinus rhythm (20 with OSA [apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15] and 20 reference patients with no OSA [apnea-hypopnea index < 15] by polysomnography) were studied. Multipolar catheters were positioned at the lateral right atrium (RA), coronary sinus, crista terminalis, and RA septum to determine the effective refractory period at 5 sites, conduction time along linear catheters at the RA and the coronary sinus, conduction at the crista terminalis, and sinus node function (corrected sinus node recovery time). Biatrial electroanatomic maps were created to determine the voltage, conduction, and distribution of complex electrograms (duration ≥ 50 ms). RESULTS: The groups had no differences in the prevalence of established risk factors for AF. Patients with OSA had the following compared with those without OSA: no difference in effective refractory period (P = .9), prolonged conduction times along the coronary sinus and RA (P = .02), greater number (P = .003) and duration (P = .03) of complex electrograms along the crista terminalis, longer P-wave duration (P = .01), longer corrected sinus node recovery time (P = .02), lower atrial voltage (RA, P <.001; left atrium, P <.001), slower atrial conduction velocity (RA, P = .001; left atrium, P = .02), and more widespread complex electrograms in both atria (RA, P = .02; left atrium, P = .01). CONCLUSION: OSA is associated with significant atrial remodeling characterized by atrial enlargement, reduction in voltage, site-specific and widespread conduction abnormalities, and longer sinus node recovery. These features may in part explain the association between OSA and AF. Crown Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: There is a known association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and atrial fibrillation (AF); however, how OSA affects the atrial myocardium is not well described. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with OSA have an abnormal atrial substrate. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing ablation of paroxysmal AF and in sinus rhythm (20 with OSA [apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15] and 20 reference patients with no OSA [apnea-hypopnea index < 15] by polysomnography) were studied. Multipolar catheters were positioned at the lateral right atrium (RA), coronary sinus, crista terminalis, and RA septum to determine the effective refractory period at 5 sites, conduction time along linear catheters at the RA and the coronary sinus, conduction at the crista terminalis, and sinus node function (corrected sinus node recovery time). Biatrial electroanatomic maps were created to determine the voltage, conduction, and distribution of complex electrograms (duration ≥ 50 ms). RESULTS: The groups had no differences in the prevalence of established risk factors for AF. Patients with OSA had the following compared with those without OSA: no difference in effective refractory period (P = .9), prolonged conduction times along the coronary sinus and RA (P = .02), greater number (P = .003) and duration (P = .03) of complex electrograms along the crista terminalis, longer P-wave duration (P = .01), longer corrected sinus node recovery time (P = .02), lower atrial voltage (RA, P <.001; left atrium, P <.001), slower atrial conduction velocity (RA, P = .001; left atrium, P = .02), and more widespread complex electrograms in both atria (RA, P = .02; left atrium, P = .01). CONCLUSION: OSA is associated with significant atrial remodeling characterized by atrial enlargement, reduction in voltage, site-specific and widespread conduction abnormalities, and longer sinus node recovery. These features may in part explain the association between OSA and AF. Crown Copyright Â
Authors: Olaf Dössel; Martin W Krueger; Frank M Weber; Mathias Wilhelms; Gunnar Seemann Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Dominik Linz; Arne van Hunnik; Christian Ukena; Sebastian Ewen; Felix Mahfoud; Stephan H Schirmer; Matthias Lenski; Hans-Ruprecht Neuberger; Ulrich Schotten; Michael Böhm Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Lien Desteghe; Jeroen M L Hendriks; R Doug McEvoy; Ching Li Chai-Coetzer; Paul Dendale; Prashanthan Sanders; Hein Heidbuchel; Dominik Linz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Bernardo J Selim; Brian B Koo; Li Qin; Sangchoon Jeon; Christine Won; Nancy S Redeker; Rachel J Lampert; John P Concato; Dawn M Bravata; Jared Ferguson; Kingman Strohl; Adam Bennett; Andrey Zinchuk; Henry K Yaggi Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 4.062