Literature DB >> 22014999

Comparative immunohistochemical study of ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma.

Hye-Jung Yoon1, Byoung-Chan Jo, Wui-Jung Shin, Young-Ah Cho, Jae-Il Lee, Sam-Pyo Hong, Seong-Doo Hong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ameloblastic carcinoma combines the histologic features of ameloblastoma with cytologic atypia, regardless of whether it has metastasized. Because of its rarity, there are few immunoprofile studies of ameloblastic carcinoma and few comparative studies of ameloblastic carcinoma and ameloblastoma. In this study, we compared the expression levels of cytokeratins (CKs), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and Ki-67 between ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma, and assessed the usefulness of these markers for differentiating the tumors. STUDY
DESIGN: We assessed CK7, CK14, CK18, CK19, MMP-2, MMP-9, and Ki-67 expression by immunohistochemistry in 10 cases of ameloblastoma and 7 cases of ameloblastic carcinoma and then compared expression patterns between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Immunostaining for CK14 and CK19 was diffuse and strongly positive in both tumor types, but staining for CK7 was focally positive in only 1 case of ameloblastoma and absent in all cases of ameloblastic carcinoma. However, there was a significant difference in CK18 expression between the 2 tumors (P = .000). Whereas 80% of ameloblastomas showed negative reactivity for CK18, most cases of ameloblastic carcinomas showed a moderate to strong intensity of immunostaining for CK18. Regarding the expression of MMPs, there were significant differences in parenchymal MMP-2 and stromal MMP-9 expression between the 2 tumors. Compared to ameloblastoma, ameloblastic carcinoma showed significantly strong expression of MMP-2 in parenchymal cells (P = .001) and MMP-9 in stromal cells (P = .013). However, there were no differences in MMP-2 expression of stromal cells and MMP-9 expression of parenchymal cells between ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma. The mean Ki-67 labeling index (LI) of ameloblastic carcinomas was 17.21%, which was significantly higher than that of ameloblastomas (3.57%; P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS: The significant expression of CK18, parenchymal MMP-2, stromal MMP-9, and Ki-67 could provide useful markers for differentiating ameloblastic carcinoma from ameloblastoma.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014999     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  14 in total

Review 1.  The diagnostic usefulness of immunohistochemistry for odontogenic lesions.

Authors:  Keith D Hunter; Paul M Speight
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2014-11-20

2.  Immunohistochemistry of Five Molecular Markers for Typing and Management of Ameloblastomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 40 Cases.

Authors:  Thasvir Singh; Arun Chandu; John Clement; Christopher Angel
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-06-02

3.  Expression level and proteolytic activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in dental follicles, dentigerous cysts, odontogenic keratocysts and unicystic ameloblastomas.

Authors:  Josué Zuriel Ortiz-García; Susana Munguía-Robledo; Juan José Estrada-Orozco; Carlos Licéaga-Escalera; Mario A Rodríguez
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (mmp-9) expression in different subtypes of ameloblastoma.

Authors:  Rachmitha Anne; Ening Krisnuhoni; Chusnul Chotimah; Benny Sjarief Latief
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-05-29

5.  Ameloblastic carcinoma: A clinicopathologic dilemma - Report of two cases with total review of literature from 1984 to 2012.

Authors:  Indu Bhusan Kar; R V Subramanyam; Niranjan Mishra; Akhilesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

6.  Incidence and overall survival of malignant ameloblastoma.

Authors:  Alexandra Rizzitelli; Nicolas R Smoll; Michael P Chae; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Heat shock protein27 expression and cell differentiation in ameloblastomas.

Authors:  Muneteru Fujita; Keisuke Nakano; Ariyoshi Funato; Yoshihiko Sugita; Toshikatsu Kubo; Hatsuhiko Maeda; Norimasa Okafuji; Hiromasa Hasegawa; Toshiyuki Kawakami
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Evaluation of PKM2 and MAPK8IP2 Polymorphism in Ameloblastic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Quantitative Study.

Authors:  Abbas Khodayari; Seyyed Mohammad Hossein Ghaderian; Mohammad Jafarian; Alireza Jahangirnia; Alireza Nayebi; Fahimeh Akhlaghi; Nasim Taghavi; Reza Akbarzadeh Najar; Sanaz Tabarestani; Arash Khojasteh; Sarah Aghabozorg Afjeh
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2012

9.  Role of immunomarkers in the clinicopathological analysis of unicystic ameloblastoma.

Authors:  Parul Sah; Aparna Menon; Asha Kamath; Chetana Chandrashekar; Sunitha Carnelio; Raghu Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Immunoexpression of Ki-67, MCM2, and MCM3 in Ameloblastoma and Ameloblastic Carcinoma and Their Correlations with Clinical and Histopathological Patterns.

Authors:  Ramón Gil Carreón-Burciaga; Rogelio González-González; Nelly Molina-Frechero; Ronell Bologna-Molina
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.