Literature DB >> 22014952

Phase II study of preoperative helical tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost for rectal cancer.

Benedikt Engels1, Koen Tournel, Hendrik Everaert, Anne Hoorens, Alexandra Sermeus, Nicolas Christian, Guy Storme, Dirk Verellen, Mark De Ridder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The addition of concomitant chemotherapy to preoperative radiotherapy is considered the standard of care for patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer. The combined treatment modality increases the complete response rate and local control (LC), but has no impact on survival or the incidence of distant metastases. In addition, it is associated with considerable toxicity. As an alternative strategy, we explored prospectively, preoperative helical tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 108 patients were treated with intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy using the Tomotherapy Hi-Art II system. A dose of 46 Gy, in daily fractions of 2 Gy, was delivered to the mesorectum and draining lymph nodes, without concomitant chemotherapy. Patients with an anticipated circumferential resection margin (CRM) of less than 2 mm, based on magnetic resonance imaging, received a SIB to the tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy. Acute and late side effects were scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients presented with cT3-4 tumors; 57 patients entered the boost group and 51 the no-boost group. One patient in the no-boost group developed a radio-hypersensitivity reaction, resulting in a complete tumor remission, a Grade 3 acute and Grade 5 late enteritis. No other Grade ≥3 acute toxicities occurred. With a median follow-up of 32 months, Grade ≥3 late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity were observed in 6% and 4% of the patients, respectively. The actuarial 2-year LC, progression-free survival and overall survival were 98%, 79%, and 93%.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative helical tomotherapy displays a favorable acute toxicity profile in patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer. A SIB can be safely administered in patients with a narrow CRM and resulted in a promising LC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014952     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

Review 1.  Advances in radiotherapy and targeted therapies for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra Sermeus; Wim Leonard; Benedikt Engels; Mark De Ridder
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Sexual organ-sparing with hydrogel spacer injections for rectal cancer radiotherapy: a feasibility pilot study.

Authors:  Vérane Achard; Frederic Ris; Michel Rouzaud; Giacomo Puppa; Nicolas C Buchs; Thomas De Perrot; Thibaud Koessler; Cristina Picardi; Thomas Zilli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Progress in rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Wim P Ceelen
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-30

4.  The cost of cancer care is not related to its outcomes.

Authors:  Guy Storme; S Dhaese; D Corens; Mark De Ridder
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-10-28

5.  Auranofin radiosensitizes tumor cells through targeting thioredoxin reductase and resulting overproduction of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Soumaya Bouzakoura; Sven de Mey; Heng Jiang; Kalun Law; Inès Dufait; Cyril Corbet; Valeri Verovski; Thierry Gevaert; Olivier Feron; Dirk Van den Berge; Guy Storme; Mark De Ridder
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-30

6.  Future directions in combined modality therapy for rectal cancer: reevaluating the role of total mesorectal excision after chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Abhishek A Solanki; Daniel T Chang; Stanley L Liauw
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Feasibility of image-guided radiotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nam P Nguyen; Misty Ceizyk; Jacqueline Vock; Paul Vos; Alexander Chi; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Judy Pugh; Rihan Khan; Christina Truong; Gabby Albala; Angela Locke; Ulf Karlsson; Steve Gelumbauskas; Lexie Smith-Raymond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Urinary adverse effects of pelvic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Brian Mehus; Sean P Elliott
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-06

9.  The effects of chemoradiotherapy on recurrence and survival in locally advanced rectal cancers with curative total mesorectal excision: a prospective, nonrandomized study.

Authors:  Erhan Akgun; Serdar Ozkok; Mevlut Tekin; Tayfun Yoldas; Cemil Caliskan; Timur Kose; Bulent Karabulut; Murat Sezak; Nevra Elmas; Omer Ozutemiz
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Age Is Not a Limiting Factor in Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) for Patients with Localized Cancer.

Authors:  Valentina Lancellotta; György Kovács; Luca Tagliaferri; Elisabetta Perrucci; Giuseppe Colloca; Vincenzo Valentini; Cynthia Aristei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.