Mei-Tsz Su1, Sheng-Hsiang Lin, Yi-Chi Chen. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan. sumeitsz@mail.ncku.edu.tw
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the genetic association between estrogen and progesterone receptor polymorphisms (ER, PR) and skewed X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis using electronic database (MEDLINE and EMBASE) up to April 2011. SETTING: 24 eligible studies from 14 countries. PATIENT(S): 2,750 RPL patients and 3,123 controls were included. INTERVENTION(S): Meta-analyses by means of random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT(S): Common polymorphisms of ER and PR and skewed XCI. RESULT(S): Of 221 potentially relevant studies, 24 case-control studies were included: 6 reports of PR polymorphisms (PROGINS), 6 reports of ER-α (3 each of rs2234693 [PvuII], rs9340799 [XbaI], and B domain) and 12 reports of skewed XCI. The integrated result showed that women with skewed XCI (>90%) had a higher risk for RPL (the summary OR [95% CI]: 2.43 [1.34-4.43]), and the subgroup analysis of those studies that included more than three consecutive miscarriages (5 studies), also showed a significant association with RPL (2.52 [1.16-5.44]). Among studies of PR (PROGINS) and ER (PuvII, XbaI, B domain) polymorphisms in RPL, the summary ORs were 1.46 (0.56-3.79), 0.90 (0.47-1.75), 0.83 (0.53-1.29), and 1.07 (0.43-2.63), respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Meta-analyses of the available data showed a significant association between skewed XCI and idiopathic RPL. More data on the associations between ER and PR polymorphisms and RPL would be helpful to elucidate their roles in RPL.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the genetic association between estrogen and progesterone receptor polymorphisms (ER, PR) and skewed X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis using electronic database (MEDLINE and EMBASE) up to April 2011. SETTING: 24 eligible studies from 14 countries. PATIENT(S): 2,750 RPLpatients and 3,123 controls were included. INTERVENTION(S): Meta-analyses by means of random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT(S): Common polymorphisms of ER and PR and skewed XCI. RESULT(S): Of 221 potentially relevant studies, 24 case-control studies were included: 6 reports of PR polymorphisms (PROGINS), 6 reports of ER-α (3 each of rs2234693 [PvuII], rs9340799 [XbaI], and B domain) and 12 reports of skewed XCI. The integrated result showed that women with skewed XCI (>90%) had a higher risk for RPL (the summary OR [95% CI]: 2.43 [1.34-4.43]), and the subgroup analysis of those studies that included more than three consecutive miscarriages (5 studies), also showed a significant association with RPL (2.52 [1.16-5.44]). Among studies of PR (PROGINS) and ER (PuvII, XbaI, B domain) polymorphisms in RPL, the summary ORs were 1.46 (0.56-3.79), 0.90 (0.47-1.75), 0.83 (0.53-1.29), and 1.07 (0.43-2.63), respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Meta-analyses of the available data showed a significant association between skewed XCI and idiopathic RPL. More data on the associations between ER and PR polymorphisms and RPL would be helpful to elucidate their roles in RPL.
Authors: Solveig Myking; Heather A Boyd; Ronny Myhre; Bjarke Feenstra; Astanand Jugessur; Aase S Devold Pay; Ingrid H G Ostensen; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Tamara Busch; Kelli K Ryckman; Frank Geller; Per Magnus; Håkon K Gjessing; Mads Melbye; Bo Jacobsson; Jeffrey C Murray Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nicoletta Di Simone; Fiorella Di Nicuolo; Riccardo Marana; Roberta Castellani; Francesco Ria; Manuela Veglia; Giovanni Scambia; Daniel Surbek; Eytan Barnea; Martin Mueller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 3.240