Literature DB >> 22014874

Evaluation of ocular hazards from 4 types of curing lights.

Daniel Labrie1, Justine Moe, Richard B T Price, Mitchell E Young, Christopher M Felix.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of ocular damage from 4 types of light curing units (LCUs) and to estimate the maximum permissible ocular exposure times from each LCU during an 8-hour workday.
METHODS: Extracted human maxillary teeth were mounted in a dentoform. Four types of LCUs (plasma arc, low-power and high-power light-emitting diode, and quartz-tungsten-halogen) were used to cure a simulated restoration in the maxillary central incisor from the facial and palatal aspects. To simulate ocular exposure, the spectral irradiance (W/[cm2 · nm]) from the LCUs was measured 5 times at each of 3 distances (30 cm, 50 cm and 100 cm) from the tooth, using a cosine-corrected probe attached, via a fibre optic cable, to a calibrated spectroradiometer. The weighted blue-light and effective ultraviolet (UV) irradiances that would be received by the eye from each LCU were calculated.
RESULTS: The maximum permissible daily exposure limits for UV light exceeded 8 hours at all distances and orientations. The maximum permissible cumulative daily exposure time to blue light was as low as 6 seconds when curing from the palatal aspect with the plasma arc LCU and as high as 1.5 hours when the low-power light-emitting diode LCU was used from the facial aspect.
CONCLUSIONS: The 4 LCUs tested did not pose a risk of UV-mediated ocular damage. The higher-powered lamps showed potential to cause blue-light-mediated ocular damage at shorter distances, with damage potentially occurring after cumulative viewing of only 6 seconds at the 30-cm distance during an 8-hour workday.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0709-8936            Impact factor:   1.316


  8 in total

1.  Guidelines for the selection, use, and maintenance of LED light-curing units - Part II.

Authors:  A C Shortall; R B Price; L MacKenzie; F J T Burke
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Low Concentration H(2)O(2)/TiO_N in Office Bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  J F Bortolatto; H Pretel; M C Floros; A C C Luizzi; A A R Dantas; E Fernandez; G Moncada; O B de Oliveira
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Occupational health hazards in a prosthodontic practice: review of risk factors and management strategies.

Authors:  Indumathi Sivakumar; Kuthalingam Subbiah Arunachalam; Egr Solomon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 4.  Ocular hazards of curing light units used in dental practice - A systematic review.

Authors:  Raniya A Alasiri; Hashim A Algarni; Reem A Alasiri
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-02-20

5.  Non-Ionizing Radiation in Swedish Health Care-Exposure and Safety Aspects.

Authors:  Kjell Hansson Mild; Ronnie Lundström; Jonna Wilén
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Utilizing Light Cure Units: A Concise Narrative Review.

Authors:  Fatin A Hasanain; Hani M Nassar
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  A study on light transmittance through red protective shields modified with different window films.

Authors:  Vanida Nimmanon; Praewpat Pachimsawat; Siribang-On Pibooniyom Khovidhunkit; Bhornsawan Thanathornwong; Thirayost Nimmanon
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30

Review 8.  Eye-related trauma and infection in dentistry.

Authors:  Hasan Ekmekcioglu; Meral Unur
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-10-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.