Literature DB >> 22014595

Outcomes of grafted bulbar urethroplasty in men with class II or III obesity.

Jamie R Privratsky1, Nima Almassi, Michael L Guralnick, Bradley J Anderson, R Corey O'Connor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of grafted bulbar urethroplasty in class II or III obese patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for men with World Health Organization class II/III obesity undergoing grafted urethroplasty for management of bulbar strictures from 2003-2010. Extracted data included age, body mass index (BMI), stricture etiology, stricture length/location, number/type of previous therapies, definitive therapy, follow-up, outcome, and complications. Outcomes were compared with a cohort of 20 age-matched nonobese men with bulbar strictures managed with grafted urethroplasty.
RESULTS: Fifteen class II/III obese men were included in the study. Obese patient age (43.8 years, range 27-60) and BMI (44.0 kg/m(2), range 35-57) were averaged. Each patient reported a mean of 3.8 previous dilations or urethrotomies (range 0-9). All men were treated with grafted bulbar urethroplasty (11 ventral, 4 dorsal) with oral mucosa (13 buccal, 2 lingual). After a mean follow-up of 29.4 months (range 7-62), the urethral patency rate was 66.7% (10/15). Complications included prolonged urethral leak in 5/15 (33%) and wound infection in 5/15 (33%) patients. Urethral patency rates and complications were significantly higher in class II/III obese patients when compared with the nonobese cohort.
CONCLUSION: Obese men demonstrated poorer outcomes after grafted bulbar urethroplasty when compared with published success rates in the general population as well as an aged-matched, nonobese cohort from our institution. Prior failed endoscopic procedures and other medical comorbidities may have also contributed to the observed results in this patient population.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014595     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

Review 1.  Management of the Recurrent Male Urethral Stricture.

Authors:  Uwais B Zaid; Garjae Lavien; Andrew C Peterson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Effect of body mass index on recurrence following urethroplasty.

Authors:  David E Rapp; James T Mills; Luriel I Smith-Harrison; Ryan P Smith; Raymond A Costabile
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

3.  Histopathologic and clinical comparison of recurrent and non-recurrent urethral stricture disease treated by reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Iryna V Samarska; Hasan Dani; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Arthur L Burnett; Andres Matoso
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

4.  Larger patients shouldn't have fewer options: urethroplasty is safe in the obese.

Authors:  Jordan Alger; Henry Collier Wright; Sameer Desale; Krishnan Venkatesan
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.