Literature DB >> 22014144

Relative static stretch-induced impairments and dynamic stretch-induced enhancements are similar in young and middle-aged men.

David G Behm1, Sebastian Plewe, Philip Grage, Alireza Rabbani, Hamid Taghi Beigi, Jeannette M Byrne, Duane C Button.   

Abstract

Middle-aged individuals may not respond in a similar manner as younger individuals. The study's objective was to examine the effect of static (SS) and dynamic stretching (DS) in young and middle-aged men on subsequent performance. Ten young (22 ± 1.4 years) and 8 middle-aged men (46.3 ± 6.5 years) participated in 3 conditions consisting of SS (4 × 30 s for right and left quadriceps, hamstrings, and plantar flexors), DS (8 × 30 s of bilateral butt kicks, walking lunges, and plantar flexors) and control. Dependent variables included sit and reach, hip extension flexibility, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, drop jump (DJ) height, static balance, reaction (RT) and movement time (MT). Measurements were taken pre-intervention, post- and 10 min post-intervention. A 3-way repeated measurement ANOVA revealed that the younger men had higher jump heights, faster RT and MT, and greater flexibility than the middle-aged men. DS significantly enhanced DJ (p = 0.04) and CMJ (p = 0.006) height compared with SS and control conditions. SS (p < 0.0001) and DS (p = 0.004) post-intervention sit and reach scores were significantly greater than pre-intervention scores. There were no significant differences between the SS and DS sit and reach scores. CMJ heights were impaired (p = 0.04) by SS. Conversely, DS post-intervention jump heights were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than SS post-, control post-, and control 10 min post-intervention. SS-induced impairments and DS-induced enhancements of CMJ height were not affected by age. DS provided similar improvements in sit and reach scores as SS. DS is recommended as the most appropriate stretching routine prior to work or athletic performance for younger and middle-aged men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014144     DOI: 10.1139/h11-107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  10 in total

1.  Acute bouts of upper and lower body static and dynamic stretching increase non-local joint range of motion.

Authors:  David George Behm; Tyler Cavanaugh; Patrick Quigley; Jonathan Christopher Reid; Priscyla Silva Monteiro Nardi; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Effects of stretching on performances involving stretch-shortening cycles.

Authors:  Heidi Kallerud; Nigel Gleeson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Acute Effects of Dynamic Stretching on Muscle Flexibility and Performance: An Analysis of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Jules Opplert; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on balance, agility, reaction time and movement time.

Authors:  Dimitris Chatzopoulos; Christos Galazoulas; Dimitrios Patikas; Christos Kotzamanidis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge.

Authors:  David J Bradbury-Squires; Jennifer C Noftall; Kathleen M Sullivan; David G Behm; Kevin E Power; Duane C Button
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Acute and Time-Course Effects of Traditional and Dynamic Warm-Up Routines in Young Elite Junior Tennis Players.

Authors:  Francisco Ayala; Víctor Moreno-Pérez; Francisco J Vera-Garcia; Manuel Moya; David Sanz-Rivas; Jaime Fernandez-Fernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Acute effects of different dynamic exercises on hamstring strain risk factors.

Authors:  Che Hsiu Chen; Ye Xin; Kuang Wu Lee; Ming Ju Lin; Jiu Jenq Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dynamic stretching alone can impair slower velocity isokinetic performance of young male handball players for at least 24 hours.

Authors:  Monoem Haddad; Mohammad Shoaib Prince; Nidhal Zarrouk; Montassar Tabben; David G Behm; Karim Chamari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Changes in Flexibility and Force are not Different after Static Versus Dynamic Stretching.

Authors:  Shingo Matsuo; Masahiro Iwata; Manabu Miyazaki; Taizan Fukaya; Eiji Yamanaka; Kentaro Nagata; Wakako Tsuchida; Yuji Asai; Shigeyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2019-10-23

10.  Acute Effects of a Static Vs. a Dynamic Stretching Warm-up on Repeated-Sprint Performance in Female Handball Players.

Authors:  Piotr Zmijewski; Patrycja Lipinska; Anna Czajkowska; Anna Mróz; Paweł Kapuściński; Krzysztof Mazurek
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.193

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.