| Literature DB >> 22013536 |
Yara Haddad1, Diane Vallerand, Antoine Brault, Jean Spénard, Pierre S Haddad.
Abstract
We explored the therapeutic effect of NCX 1000, a derivative of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) with nitric oxide (NO) donating properties, alone or in combination with vitamin E, in an experimental model of NASH in the rat. Methods. A control group was fed a standard liquid diet (Control), and the NASH groups were fed a high-fat liquid diet for 12 weeks without (NASH) or with simultaneous daily gavage with either NCX 1000 at 15 or 30 mg/kg (N15 and N30, resp.), or N15 plus vitamin E 100 mg/kg (N15 + VitE) for the last 6 weeks; UDCA 17.2 mg/kg was used as a reference. Results. NASH rats developed all key features of the disease. Treatments with N30 improved liver histology, decreased lipid peroxidation, and completely suppressed increases in LDH release, plasma insulin, and TNF-α. It also decreased O(2) (∙-) release and returned liver weight and glutathione back to normal. All effects were similar to the reference treatment, UDCA. The N15 treatment was less efficient than the N30 group, but became comparable to the latter when combined to vitamin E. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that NCX 1000 has potent cytoprotective, antioxidant, and hypoinsulinemic properties that can be enhanced by combination with vitamin E.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22013536 PMCID: PMC3195504 DOI: 10.4061/2011/136816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hepatol
Effect of treatments on body and liver weight.
| Parameters | BW (g) | WG (g) | LW (g) | LI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 563 ± 19 | 475 ± 8 | 14.4 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| NASH | 523 ± 17 | 464 ± 15 | 16.2 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 0.1* |
| UDCA | 505 ± 15 | 436 ± 15 | 13.4 ± 0.6† | 2.7 ± 0.1† |
| N30 | 537 ± 26 | 461 ± 25 | 14.0 ± 0.9† | 2.6 ± 0.1† |
| N15 | 554 ± 16 | 478 ± 17 | 14.6 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.1† |
| N15 + VitE | 547 ± 12 | 469 ± 14 | 15.0 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 0.1† |
|
| ||||
| ANOVA | 0.292 | 0.360 | 0.248 | 0.021 |
Figure 1Effect of treatments on glycemic homeostasis.
Effect of treatments on biochemical and lipid parameters.
| Parameters | AST | ALT | TC | HDL | LDL | TG | LDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U/L | U/L | mmol/L | mmol/L | mmol/L | mmol/L | U/L | |
| Control | 53.5 ± 4.9 | 30.2 ± 3.6 | 0.75 ± 0.07 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 62 ± 5 |
| NASH | 67.8 ± 9.5 | 39.8 ± 5.6 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.03* | 0.31 ± 0.04* | 111 ± 13* |
| UDCA | 59.2 ± 2.5 | 34.2 ± 2.4 | 0.54 ± 0.03† | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.03* | 68 ± 4† |
| N30 | 54.2 ± 5.8 | 31.7 ± 4.5 | 0.75 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.03* | 68 ± 8† |
| N15 | 57.9 ± 5.7 | 36.5 ± 4.9 | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.02† | 0.31 ± 0.02* | 77 ± 12† |
| N15 + VitE | 51.7 ± 3.9 | 29.1 ± 2.7 | 0.70 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.03* | 80 ± 13 |
|
| |||||||
| ANOVA | 0.448 | 0.461 | 0.033 | 0.053 | 0.012 | <0.0001 | 0.077 |
Figure 2Effect of treatments on liver histology.
Liver histology scoring for macrovesicular steatosis and inflammatory cells infiltration.
| Groups |
| Steatosis | Inflammation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Control | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| NASH | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | ||
| UDCA | 10 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | ||
| N30 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | ||
| N15 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | ||
| N15 + VitE | 10 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| Chi square |
|
| |||||||||
Figure 3Effect of treatments on inflammatory cytokines and adipokines.
Figure 4Effect of treatments on oxidative stress.
Figure 5Effect of treatments on mitochondrial ATP.
Figure 6Effect of treatments on CYP2E1 and PPAR-α.