BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite the intense interest in phenological adaptation to environmental change, the fundamental character of natural variation in germination is almost entirely unknown. Specifically, it is not known whether different genotypes within a species are germination specialists to particular conditions, nor is it known what physiological mechanisms of germination regulation vary in natural populations and how they are associated with responses to particular environmental factors. METHODS: We used a set of recombinant inbred genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana, in which linkage disequilibrium has been disrupted over seven generations, to test for genetic variation and covariation in germination responses to distinct environmental factors. We then examined physiological mechanisms associated with those responses, including seed-coat permeability and sensitivity to the phytohormones gibberellic acid (GA) and abscisic acid (ABA). KEY RESULTS: Genetic variation for germination was environment-dependent, but no evidence for specialization of germination to different conditions was found. Hormonal sensitivities also exhibited significant genetic variation, but seed-coat properties did not. GA sensitivity was associated with germination responses to multiple environmental factors, but seed-coat permeability and ABA sensitivity were associated with specific germination responses, suggesting that an evolutionary change in GA sensitivity could affect germination in multiple environments, but that of ABA sensitivity may affect germination under more restricted conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The physiological mechanisms of germination responses to specific environmental factors therefore can influence the ability to adapt to diverse seasonal environments encountered during colonization of new habitats or with future predicted climate change.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite the intense interest in phenological adaptation to environmental change, the fundamental character of natural variation in germination is almost entirely unknown. Specifically, it is not known whether different genotypes within a species are germination specialists to particular conditions, nor is it known what physiological mechanisms of germination regulation vary in natural populations and how they are associated with responses to particular environmental factors. METHODS: We used a set of recombinant inbred genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana, in which linkage disequilibrium has been disrupted over seven generations, to test for genetic variation and covariation in germination responses to distinct environmental factors. We then examined physiological mechanisms associated with those responses, including seed-coat permeability and sensitivity to the phytohormones gibberellic acid (GA) and abscisic acid (ABA). KEY RESULTS: Genetic variation for germination was environment-dependent, but no evidence for specialization of germination to different conditions was found. Hormonal sensitivities also exhibited significant genetic variation, but seed-coat properties did not. GA sensitivity was associated with germination responses to multiple environmental factors, but seed-coat permeability and ABA sensitivity were associated with specific germination responses, suggesting that an evolutionary change in GA sensitivity could affect germination in multiple environments, but that of ABA sensitivity may affect germination under more restricted conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The physiological mechanisms of germination responses to specific environmental factors therefore can influence the ability to adapt to diverse seasonal environments encountered during colonization of new habitats or with future predicted climate change.
Authors: W van Der Schaar; C Alonso-Blanco; K M Léon-Kloosterziel; R C Jansen; J W van Ooijen; M Koornneef Journal: Heredity (Edinb) Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 3.821
Authors: Paul C Bethke; Igor G L Libourel; Natsuyo Aoyama; Yong-Yoon Chung; David W Still; Russell L Jones Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2007-01-12 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Charles G Willis; Brad Ruhfel; Richard B Primack; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Charles C Davis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Leónie Bentsink; Johannes Hanson; Corrie J Hanhart; Hetty Blankestijn-de Vries; Colin Coltrane; Paul Keizer; Mohamed El-Lithy; Carlos Alonso-Blanco; M Teresa de Andrés; Matthieu Reymond; Fred van Eeuwijk; Sjef Smeekens; Maarten Koornneef Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tonia M Korves; Karl J Schmid; Ana L Caicedo; Charlotte Mays; John R Stinchcombe; Michael D Purugganan; Johanna Schmitt Journal: Am Nat Date: 2007-03-07 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Kai Graeber; Ada Linkies; Tina Steinbrecher; Klaus Mummenhoff; Danuše Tarkowská; Veronika Turečková; Michael Ignatz; Katja Sperber; Antje Voegele; Hans de Jong; Terezie Urbanová; Miroslav Strnad; Gerhard Leubner-Metzger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 11.205