Literature DB >> 22012529

Early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Allan A Young1, Margaret M Smith, Guillaume Bacle, Claudio Moraga, Gilles Walch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis affecting the shoulder is typically associated with rotator cuff compromise and can also result in severe glenoid erosion. Since reverse shoulder arthroplasty is capable of addressing both rotator cuff disorders and glenoid bone deficiencies, our aim was to evaluate the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and either or both of these associated conditions.
METHODS: We performed eighteen primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties in sixteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis involving the shoulder as well as associated rotator cuff compromise and/or severe erosion of the glenoid bone between 2002 and 2007. Patients were assessed with use of the Constant score, patient satisfaction score, subjective shoulder value, range of shoulder motion, and imaging studies.
RESULTS: The mean Constant score improved from 22.5 to 64.9 points at a mean of 3.8 years (range, 2.1 to 7.0 years) postoperatively. The patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of the surgery in seventeen of the eighteen shoulders. The mean subjective shoulder value was 68.6% postoperatively. Active forward elevation improved from 77.5° to 138.6°, and external rotation with the arm in 90° of abduction improved from 16.9° to 46.1°. The mean Constant score improved from 28.0 points to 74.3 points in shoulders in which the teres minor muscle was normal before the surgery, and it improved from 20.8 to 54.6 points in shoulders with an atrophic teres minor muscle. Scapular notching was observed in ten of the eighteen shoulders. A fracture involving the acromion, acromial spine, coracoid, or greater tuberosity was observed either intraoperatively or postoperatively in four of the eighteen shoulders. One case of transient axillary nerve injury was noted. There were no cases of dislocation, infection, or component loosening. None of the patients required revision surgery for any reason.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparatively good outcomes were observed in the short to intermediate term after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, surgeons should be aware of the risk of intraoperative and postoperative fractures in this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22012529     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  36 in total

1.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty in failed shoulder arthroplasties for rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Filippo Randelli; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Cabitza; Vincenza Ragone; Luca Pulici; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08

3.  Ranges of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty improve significantly the first year after surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Hannu Tiusanen; Pjotor Sarantsin; Miika Stenholm; Ryan Mattie; Mikhail Saltychev
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-05-19

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis since the introduction of disease-modifying drugs.

Authors:  Devin R Mangold; Eric R Wagner; Robert H Cofield; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Julio J Jauregui; J Paul Hovis; S Ashfaq Hasan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Smithers; Allan A Young; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 7.  Reverse shoulder prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Postacchini; Stefano Carbone; Gianfranco Canero; Maurizio Ripani; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Pain and function in eight hundred and fifty nine patients comparing shoulder hemiprostheses, resurfacing prostheses, reversed total and conventional total prostheses.

Authors:  Bjørg-Tilde S Fevang; Stein H L Lygre; Glenn Bertelsen; Arne Skredderstuen; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  [Operative treatment of the rheumatic shoulder].

Authors:  G Heers; J Grifka; H R Springorum; B Craiovan; S Anders
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 10.  Activity following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: What should surgeons be advising?

Authors:  Scott J MacInnes; Katherine E Mackie; Andrew Titchener; Rebekah Gibbons; Allan W Wang
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.