Literature DB >> 22012448

Identification of respiratory virus in infants with congenital heart disease by comparison of different methods.

Tatiana Mitiko Kanashiro1, Lucy Santos Vilas Boas, Ana Maria Thomaz, Tania Regina Tozetto-Mendoza, Mônica Setsuko, Clarisse Martins Machado.   

Abstract

Respiratory virus infections are the main cause of infant hospitalization and are potentially severe in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Rapid and sensitive diagnosis is very important to early introduction of antiviral treatment and implementation of precautions to control transmission, reducing the risk of nosocomial infections. In the present study we compare different techniques in the diagnosis of respiratory viruses in CHD infants. Thirty-nine samples of nasopharyngeal aspirate were obtained from CHD infants with symptoms of respiratory infection. The Multiplex PCR (Seeplex® RV 12 ACE Detection) driven to the detection of 12 respiratory viruses was compared with the direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and PCR, both targeting seven respiratory viruses. The positivity found by DFA, Multiplex and PCR was 33.3%, 51.3% and 48.7%, respectively. Kappa index comparing DFA and Multiplex, DFA and PCR and PCR and Multiplex PCR was 0.542, 0.483 and 0.539, respectively. The concordance between techniques was considered moderate. Both Multiplex PCR (p = 0.001) and PCR (p = 0.002) detected significantly more respiratory virus than DFA. As the performance of the tests may vary, the combination of two or more techniques may increase diagnostic sensitivity favoring the diagnosis of co-infections, early introduction of antiviral therapy and implementation of appropriate measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22012448     DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46652011000500001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo        ISSN: 0036-4665            Impact factor:   1.846


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Anyplex II RV16 with the xTAG respiratory viral panel and Seeplex RV15 for detection of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Hyun-Ki Kim; Sung-Hee Oh; Kyung Ah Yun; Heungsup Sung; Mi-Na Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel Fast v2 Assay With Anyplex II RV16 Detection Kit and AdvanSure RV Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses.

Authors:  Dae Hyun Ko; Hyun Soo Kim; Jungwon Hyun; Han Sung Kim; Jae Seok Kim; Kyoung Un Park; Wonkeun Song
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Clinical and economical impact of multiplex respiratory virus assays.

Authors:  Emilie Vallières; Christian Renaud
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections in children undergoing heart surgery.

Authors:  Thalis Henrique da Silva; João Renato Rebello Pinho; Tarcísio José da Silva Junior; Fabio Carmona
Journal:  Prog Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.