Literature DB >> 22011888

Fluoride release from restorative materials.

Gabriela Romanini Basso1, Alvaro Della Bona, Delton Luiz Gobbi, Dileta Cecchetti.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro fluoride (F) release from 4 restorative materials (3M ESPE): Ketak Molar Easymix [KME - conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC)]; Rely-X luting 2 [RL2 - resin-modified GIC (RMGIC)]; Vitremer (VIT- RMGIC); and Filtek Z250 [Z250 - negative control]. Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions and placed into 10 mL of reverse osmosis water at 37°C until the analyses were done using a liquid membrane for selective F ion electrode (Orion 710). F release was evaluated every 6 h in the first day and thereafter daily during 28 days (d). The results were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Mean F release and standard deviation values (in ppm) were: KME: 6 h- 0.34 ± 0.04; 24 h- 1.22 ± 0.30; 7 d- 0.29 ± 0.09; 14 d- 0.20 ± 0.04; 28 d- 0.16 ± 0.01; RL2: 6 h- 2.46 ± 0.48; 24 h-12.33 ± 2.93; 7 d- 1.37 ± 0.38; 14 d- 0.80 ± 0.13; 28 d- 0.80 ± 0.21; VIT: 6 h- 0.98 ± 0.35; 24 h- 4.35 ± 1.22; 7 d- 0.66 ± 0.23; 14 d- 0.40 ± 0.07; 28 d- 0.39 ± 0.08; Z250: 6 h- 0.029 ± 0.001; 24 h- 0.024 ± 0.009; 7 d- 0.023 ± 0.004; 14 d- 0.025 ± 0.001; 28 d- 0.028 ± 0.001. RL2 RMGIC released more F than the other materials in all periods. The greatest release of F occurred in the first 24 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22011888     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000500001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  6 in total

1.  Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Luciano Casagrande; Alejandra Tejeda Seminario; Marcos Britto Correa; Stefanie Bressan Werle; Marisa Maltz; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Fernando Borba de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vitro fluoride release from a different kind of conventional and resin modified glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  Mediha Selimović-Dragaš; Lajla Hasić-Branković; Fehim Korać; Nermin Đapo; Amina Huseinbegović; Sedin Kobašlija; Meliha Lekić; Šahza Hatibović-Kofman
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 3.  Factors influencing fluoride release in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) materials: A review.

Authors:  P Divya Kumari; Shahnawaz Khijmatgar; Avidyuti Chowdhury; Edward Lynch; Chitta R Chowdhury
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-06-27

4.  Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements-An in vitro study.

Authors:  Yasemin Dziuk; Sachin Chhatwani; Stephan C Möhlhenrich; Sabrina Tulka; Ella A Naumova; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer with Nano Filled Coat and Varnish.

Authors:  Valentina Brzović-Rajić; Ivana Miletić; Sevil Gurgan; Kristina Peroš; Željko Verzak; Ana Ivanišević-Malčić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2018-12

6.  Release and Recharge of Fluoride Ions from Acrylic Resin Modified with Bioactive Glass.

Authors:  Zbigniew Raszewski; Danuta Nowakowska; Wlodzimierz Wieckiewicz; Agnieszka Nowakowska-Toporowska
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.