Literature DB >> 22011780

Transapical aortic 'valve-in-valve' procedure for degenerated stented bioprosthesis.

Enrico Ferrari1.   

Abstract

Standard surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis remains the treatment of choice for low- and mid-risk elderly patients (traditionally >65 years of age) suffering from severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency, and for young patients with formal contraindications to long-lasting anticoagulation. Unfortunately, despite the fact that several technical improvements have noticeably improved the resistance of pericardial and bovine bioprostheses to leaflet calcifications and ruptures, the risk of early valve failure with rapid degeneration still exists, especially for patients under haemodialysis and for patients <60 years of age at the time of surgery. Until now, redo open heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass and on cardioplegic arrest was the only available therapeutic option in case of bioprosthesis degeneration, but it carried a higher surgical risk when elderly patients with severe concomitant comorbidities were concerned. Since a few years, the advent of new transcatheter aortic valve procedures has opened new horizons in cardiac surgery and, in particular, the possibility of implanting stented valves within the degenerated stented bioprosthesis, the so-called 'valve-in-valve' (VinV) concept, has become a clinical practice in experienced cardiac centres. The VinV procedure represents a minimally invasive approach dedicated to high-risk redo patients, and published preliminary reports have shown a success rate of 100% with absence of significant valvular leaks, acceptable transvalvular gradients and low complication rate. However, this procedure is not riskless and the most important concerns are about the size mismatch and the right positioning within the degenerated bioprosthesis. In this article, we review the limited available literature about VinV procedures, underline important technical details for the positioning and provide guidelines to prevent valve-prosthesis mismatch comparing the three sizes of the only commercially available transapical device, the Edwards Sapien, with the inner diameter of three of the most commonly used stented bioprostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22011780     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

1.  Choice of Aortic Valve Prosthesis in a Rapidly Aging and Long-Living Society.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Michio Yoshitake; Yoko Matsumura; Hitomi Naruse; Ko Bando; Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  Transcatheter aortic "valve-in-valve" for degenerated bioprostheses: Choosing the right TAVI valve.

Authors:  Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

3.  Stroke following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Is neuroprotection justified?

Authors:  Maciej Dąbrowski; Adam Witkowski
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 1.426

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.