OBJECTIVE: To compare an interventional protocol with a standard protocol for preventing the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, nonblinded clinical trial. SETTING: Medical ICUs of 2 French university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred adults with an expected length of stay in the ICU greater than 48 hours. INTERVENTIONS: For the intervention group, the protocol required repeated MRSA screening, contact and droplet isolation precautions for patients at risk for MRSA at ICU admission and for MRSA-positive patients, and decontamination with nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine body wash for MRSA-positive patients. For the standard group, the standard precautions protocol was used, and the results of repeated MRSA screening in the standard group were not communicated to investigators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: MRSA acquisition rate in the ICU. An audit was conducted to assess compliance with hygiene and isolation precautions. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat analysis ([Formula: see text]), the MRSA acquisition rate in the ICU was similar in the standard (13 [5.3%] of 243) and intervention (16 [6.5%] of 245) groups ([Formula: see text]). The audit showed that the overall compliance rate was 85.5% in the standard group and 84.1% in the intervention group ([Formula: see text]), although compliance was higher when isolation precautions were absent than when they were in place (88.2% vs 79.1%; [Formula: see text]). MRSA incidence rates were higher without isolation precautions (7.57‰) than with isolation precautions (2.36‰; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: Individual allocation to MRSA screening, isolation precautions, and decontamination do not provide individual benefit in reducing MRSA acquisition, compared with standard precautions, although the collective risk was lower during the periods of isolation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00151606.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare an interventional protocol with a standard protocol for preventing the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, nonblinded clinical trial. SETTING: Medical ICUs of 2 French university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred adults with an expected length of stay in the ICU greater than 48 hours. INTERVENTIONS: For the intervention group, the protocol required repeated MRSA screening, contact and droplet isolation precautions for patients at risk for MRSA at ICU admission and for MRSA-positive patients, and decontamination with nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine body wash for MRSA-positive patients. For the standard group, the standard precautions protocol was used, and the results of repeated MRSA screening in the standard group were not communicated to investigators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: MRSA acquisition rate in the ICU. An audit was conducted to assess compliance with hygiene and isolation precautions. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat analysis ([Formula: see text]), the MRSA acquisition rate in the ICU was similar in the standard (13 [5.3%] of 243) and intervention (16 [6.5%] of 245) groups ([Formula: see text]). The audit showed that the overall compliance rate was 85.5% in the standard group and 84.1% in the intervention group ([Formula: see text]), although compliance was higher when isolation precautions were absent than when they were in place (88.2% vs 79.1%; [Formula: see text]). MRSA incidence rates were higher without isolation precautions (7.57‰) than with isolation precautions (2.36‰; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: Individual allocation to MRSA screening, isolation precautions, and decontamination do not provide individual benefit in reducing MRSA acquisition, compared with standard precautions, although the collective risk was lower during the periods of isolation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00151606.
Authors: Lennie P G Derde; Ben S Cooper; Herman Goossens; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Rob J L Willems; Marek Gniadkowski; Waleria Hryniewicz; Joanna Empel; Mirjam J D Dautzenberg; Djillali Annane; Irene Aragão; Annie Chalfine; Uga Dumpis; Francisco Esteves; Helen Giamarellou; Igor Muzlovic; Giuseppe Nardi; George L Petrikkos; Viktorija Tomic; Antonio Torres Martí; Pascal Stammet; Christian Brun-Buisson; Marc J M Bonten Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 25.071