Literature DB >> 22011048

Investigation of the differences in activity between hydroxycycloalkyl N1 substituted pyrazole derivatives as inhibitors of B-Raf kinase by using docking, molecular dynamics, QM/MM, and fragment-based de novo design: study of binding mode of diastereomer compounds.

Julio Caballero1, Jans H Alzate-Morales, Ariela Vergara-Jaque.   

Abstract

N1 substituted pyrazole derivatives show diverse B-Raf kinase inhibitory activities when different hydroxy-substituted cycloalkyl groups are placed at this position. Docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and hybrid calculation methods (Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics (QM/MM)) were performed on the complexes, in order to explain these differences. Docking of the inhibitors showed the same orientation that X-ray crystal structure of the analogous (1E)-5-[1-(4-piperidinyl)-3-(4-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one oxime. MD simulations of the most active diastereomer compounds containing cis- and trans-3-hydroxycyclohexyl substituents showed stable interactions with residue Ile463 at the entrance of the B-Raf active site. On the other hand, the less active diastereomer compounds containing cis- and trans-2-hydroxycyclopentyl substituents showed interactions with inner residues Asn580 and Ser465. We found that the differences in activity can be explained by considering the dynamic interactions between the inhibitors and their surrounding residues within the B-Raf binding site. We also explained the activity trend by using a testing scoring function derived from more reliable QM/MM calculations. In addition, we search for new inhibitors from a virtual screening carried out by fragment-based de novo design. We generated a set of approximately 200 virtual compounds, which interact with Ile463 and fulfill druglikeness properties according to Lipinski, Veber, and Ghose rules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22011048     DOI: 10.1021/ci200306w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  7 in total

1.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis serine/threonine protein kinases: structural information for the design of their specific ATP-competitive inhibitors.

Authors:  Julio Caballero; Alejandro Morales-Bayuelo; Carlos Navarro-Retamal
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Evaluation of Substituted Pyrazole-Based Kinase Inhibitors in One Decade (2011-2020): Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Mohammed I El-Gamal; Seyed-Omar Zaraei; Moustafa M Madkour; Hanan S Anbar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Identification and synthesis of N-(thiophen-2-yl) benzamide derivatives as BRAF(V600E) inhibitors.

Authors:  Yunfeng Xie; Xianjie Chen; Jie Qin; Xiangqian Kong; Fei Ye; Yuren Jiang; Hong Liu; Hualiang Jiang; Ronen Marmorstein; Cheng Luo
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Docking and quantitative structure-activity relationship of oxadiazole derivates as inhibitors of GSK3β.

Authors:  Luisa Quesada-Romero; Julio Caballero
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.943

5.  Exploring Molecular Mechanisms of Paradoxical Activation in the BRAF Kinase Dimers: Atomistic Simulations of Conformational Dynamics and Modeling of Allosteric Communication Networks and Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Amanda Tse; Gennady M Verkhivker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Insights into the interactions between maleimide derivates and GSK3β combining molecular docking and QSAR.

Authors:  Luisa Quesada-Romero; Karel Mena-Ulecia; William Tiznado; Julio Caballero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data?

Authors:  David Ramírez; Julio Caballero
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.