Literature DB >> 22010375

Particulate matter in new technology diesel exhaust (NTDE) is quantitatively and qualitatively very different from that found in traditional diesel exhaust (TDE).

Thomas W Hesterberg1, Christopher M Long, Sonja N Sax, Charles A Lapin, Roger O McClellan, William B Bunn, Peter A Valberg.   

Abstract

Diesel exhaust (DE) characteristic of pre-1988 engines is classified as a "probable" human carcinogen (Group 2A) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified DE as "likely to be carcinogenic to humans." These classifications were based on the large body of health effect studies conducted on DE over the past 30 or so years. However, increasingly stringent U.S. emissions standards (1988-2010) for particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) in diesel exhaust have helped stimulate major technological advances in diesel engine technology and diesel fuel/lubricant composition, resulting in the emergence of what has been termed New Technology Diesel Exhaust, or NTDE. NTDE is defined as DE from post-2006 and older retrofit diesel engines that incorporate a variety of technological advancements, including electronic controls, ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel, oxidation catalysts, and wall-flow diesel particulate filters (DPFs). As discussed in a prior review (T. W. Hesterberg et al.; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6437-6445), numerous emissions characterization studies have demonstrated marked differences in regulated and unregulated emissions between NTDE and "traditional diesel exhaust" (TDE) from pre-1988 diesel engines. Now there exist even more data demonstrating significant chemical and physical distinctions between the diesel exhaust particulate (DEP) in NTDE versus DEP from pre-2007 diesel technology, and its greater resemblance to particulate emissions from compressed natural gas (CNG) or gasoline engines. Furthermore, preliminary toxicological data suggest that the changes to the physical and chemical composition of NTDE lead to differences in biological responses between NTDE versus TDE exposure. Ongoing studies are expected to address some of the remaining data gaps in the understanding of possible NTDE health effects, but there is now sufficient evidence to conclude that health effects studies of pre-2007 DE likely have little relevance in assessing the potential health risks of NTDE exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22010375     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2011.599277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  15 in total

1.  Health effects research and regulation of diesel exhaust: an historical overview focused on lung cancer risk.

Authors:  Thomas W Hesterberg; Christopher M Long; William B Bunn; Charles A Lapin; Roger O McClellan; Peter A Valberg
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Quantifying traffic exposure.

Authors:  Gregory C Pratt; Kris Parson; Naomi Shinoda; Paula Lindgren; Sara Dunlap; Barbara Yawn; Peter Wollan; Jean Johnson
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  A systematic review of the health effects associated with the inhalation of particle-filtered and whole diesel exhaust.

Authors:  Chelsea A Weitekamp; Lukas B Kerr; Laura Dishaw; Jennifer Nichols; McKayla Lein; Michael J Stewart
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Adopting Clean Fuels and Technologies on School Buses. Pollution and Health Impacts in Children.

Authors:  Sara D Adar; Jennifer D'Souza; Lianne Sheppard; Joel D Kaufman; Teal S Hallstrand; Mark E Davey; James R Sullivan; Jordan Jahnke; Jane Koenig; Timothy V Larson; L J Sally Liu
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Combined Toxicity of Metal Nanoparticles: Comparison of Individual and Mixture Particles Effect.

Authors:  Ayse Basak Engin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Lung cancer and diesel exhaust: an updated critical review of the occupational epidemiology literature.

Authors:  John F Gamble; Mark J Nicolich; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Factors and Trends Affecting the Identification of a Reliable Biomarker for Diesel Exhaust Exposure.

Authors:  David A Morgott
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.561

Review 8.  Potential hazards associated with combustion of bio-derived versus petroleum-derived diesel fuel.

Authors:  Jürgen Bünger; Jürgen Krahl; Olaf Schröder; Lasse Schmidt; Götz A Westphal
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.635

9.  Toxicological properties of emission particles from heavy duty engines powered by conventional and bio-based diesel fuels and compressed natural gas.

Authors:  Pasi I Jalava; Päivi Aakko-Saksa; Timo Murtonen; Mikko S Happo; Ari Markkanen; Pasi Yli-Pirilä; Pasi Hakulinen; Risto Hillamo; Jorma Mäki-Paakkanen; Raimo O Salonen; Jorma Jokiniemi; Maija-Riitta Hirvonen
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 10.  Inflammation-related effects of diesel engine exhaust particles: studies on lung cells in vitro.

Authors:  P E Schwarze; A I Totlandsdal; M Låg; M Refsnes; J A Holme; J Øvrevik
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.