OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of genotypic methods for predicting the co-receptor usage of subtypes B and non-B HIV-1 primary isolates, using as gold standard the infectivity of each primary isolate in GHOST cells stably expressing HIV-1 co-receptors. METHODS: Primary isolates were obtained by co-culturing either patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or ultracentrifuged plasma with donor-activated PBMCs. In vitro co-receptor usage was determined by infecting GHOST cells. Tropism prediction, based on V3 sequences, was determined with simple rules and bioinformatic tools (Geno2pheno[coreceptor] and WebPSSM). RESULTS: This study includes 102 HIV-1 primary isolates; 23 (22.5%) subtype B and 79 (77.5%) non-B genetic forms. V3 sequences were classified into six subtypes (A-G), although 32 (31.4%) were circulating recombinant forms and 21 (20.6%) were unique recombinant forms. Sixty-nine isolates were R5, 27 R5X4 and 6 X4. The highest levels of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of X4 strains among V3 sequences, between 91% and 100%, were obtained by using PSSM(x4r5), PSSM(si/nsi) and the 11/25 rule for sequences of subtypes A, B and G, but not for subtype F. Establishing the recommended cut-off for clinical settings of a 10% false positive rate for Geno2pheno, we obtained 93% specificity and 97% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing genotypic assays for HIV-1 co-receptor use with a cell-culture phenotypic assay could provide more reliable results of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of X4 strains than comparing them with recombinant assays, considered as gold standard. In general, except for subtype F isolates, there is a good correlation for tropism prediction.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of genotypic methods for predicting the co-receptor usage of subtypes B and non-B HIV-1 primary isolates, using as gold standard the infectivity of each primary isolate in GHOST cells stably expressing HIV-1 co-receptors. METHODS: Primary isolates were obtained by co-culturing either patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or ultracentrifuged plasma with donor-activated PBMCs. In vitro co-receptor usage was determined by infecting GHOST cells. Tropism prediction, based on V3 sequences, was determined with simple rules and bioinformatic tools (Geno2pheno[coreceptor] and WebPSSM). RESULTS: This study includes 102 HIV-1 primary isolates; 23 (22.5%) subtype B and 79 (77.5%) non-B genetic forms. V3 sequences were classified into six subtypes (A-G), although 32 (31.4%) were circulating recombinant forms and 21 (20.6%) were unique recombinant forms. Sixty-nine isolates were R5, 27 R5X4 and 6 X4. The highest levels of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of X4 strains among V3 sequences, between 91% and 100%, were obtained by using PSSM(x4r5), PSSM(si/nsi) and the 11/25 rule for sequences of subtypes A, B and G, but not for subtype F. Establishing the recommended cut-off for clinical settings of a 10% false positive rate for Geno2pheno, we obtained 93% specificity and 97% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing genotypic assays for HIV-1 co-receptor use with a cell-culture phenotypic assay could provide more reliable results of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of X4 strains than comparing them with recombinant assays, considered as gold standard. In general, except for subtype F isolates, there is a good correlation for tropism prediction.
Authors: Benjamas Aiamkitsumrit; Will Dampier; Gregory Antell; Nina Rivera; Julio Martin-Garcia; Vanessa Pirrone; Michael R Nonnemacher; Brian Wigdahl Journal: Curr HIV Res Date: 2014 Impact factor: 1.581
Authors: Susanna L Lamers; Gary B Fogel; Enoch S Liu; Marco Salemi; Michael S McGrath Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Ana M Sanchez; C Todd DeMarco; Bhavna Hora; Sarah Keinonen; Yue Chen; Christie Brinkley; Mars Stone; Leslie Tobler; Sheila Keating; Marco Schito; Michael P Busch; Feng Gao; Thomas N Denny Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2014-01-19 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Anthony Kebira Nyamache; Anne W T Muigai; Zipporah Ng'ang'a; Samoel A Khamadi Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Kah Ying Ng; Kuan Kiat Chew; Palvinder Kaur; Joe Yap Kwan; Wei Xin Khong; Li Lin; Arlene Chua; Mei Ting Tan; Thomas C Quinn; Oliver Laeyendecker; Yee Sin Leo; Oon Tek Ng Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 3.090