Literature DB >> 22010083

Proliferation assessment of primary human mesenchymal stem cells on collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration.

Qin Liu1, Andreas Humpe, Dimitris Kletsas, Frauke Warnke, Stephan T Becker, Timothy Douglas, Sureshan Sivananthan, Patrick H Warnke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) hold the potential for bone regeneration because of their self-renewing and multipotent character. The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of collagen membranes on the proliferation of hMSCs derived from bone marrow. A special focus was set on short-term eluates derived from collagen membranes, as volatile toxic materials washed out from these membranes may influence cell behavior during the short time course of oral surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proliferation of hMSCs seeded directly on a collagen membrane (BioGide) was evaluated quantitatively using the cell proliferation reagent WST-1 (4-3-[4-iodophenyl]-2-[4-nitrophenyl]-2H-[5-tetrazolio]-1, 3--benzol-disulfonate) and qualitatively by scanning electron microscopy. Two standard biocompatibility tests, namely the lactate dehydrogenase and MTT (3-[4, 5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl]-2, 5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazoliumbromide) tests, were performed using hMSCs cultivated in eluates from membranes incubated for 10 minutes, 1 hour, or 24 hours in serum-free cell culture medium. The data were analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy showed large numbers of hMSCs with well-spread morphology on the collagen membranes after 7 days of culture. The WST test revealed significantly better proliferation of hMSCs on collagen membranes after 4 days of culture compared to cells cultured on a cover glass. Cytotoxicity levels were low, peaking in short-term eluates and decreasing with longer incubation times.
CONCLUSION: Porcine collagen membranes showed good biocompatibility in vitro for hMSCs. If maximum cell proliferation rates are required, a prewash of membranes prior to application may be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22010083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of different carrier materials with rat bone marrow MSCs.

Authors:  M Gierloff; T Nitsche; S Adam-Klages; K Liebs; J Hedderich; V Gassling; J Wiltfang; D Kabelitz; Y Açil
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  On the search of the ideal barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Jordi Caballé-Serrano; Antonio Munar-Frau; Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat; David Soto-Penaloza; Miguel Peñarrocha; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-05-01

3.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Tadas Korzinskas; Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Kristina Glenske; Michael Hahn; Sabine Wenisch; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  In Vitro Direct and Indirect Cytotoxicity Comparative Analysis of One Pre-Hydrated versus One Dried Acellular Porcine Dermal Matrix.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Rodolfo Reda; Dario Di Nardo; Gabriele Miccoli; Alessio Zanza; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Non-cross-linked collagen type I/III materials enhance cell proliferation: in vitro and in vivo evidence.

Authors:  Ines Willershausen; Mike Barbeck; Nicole Boehm; Robert Sader; Brita Willershausen; Charles James Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.