OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present an alternative technique for the pre-operative localisation of solely MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions using a computer-assisted MRI-guided radio-guided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) technique. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2010, 25 females with a total of 25 suspicious breast lesions that could be detected only by MRI, and for whom breast surgery was planned, underwent the computer-assisted MRI-guided ROLL technique. A seven-channel biopsy breast array coil and computerised diagnostic workstation were used for the localisation procedure. Three-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced axial images were taken. After investigating the localisation co-ordinates with the help of intervention software on a workstation, an 18 G coaxial cannula was placed in the exact position determined. Following verification of the cannula position by additional axial scans, (99m)Tc-labelled macroalbumin aggregate and MRI contrast material were injected. Post-procedure MRI scans were used to confirm the correct localisation. RESULTS: All the procedures were technically successful. The mean lesion size was 10.8 mm (range: 4-25 mm). The mean total magnet and the mean localisation times were 28.6 min (range: 18-46 min) and 13.1 min (range: 8-20 min), respectively. Grid and pillar methods were used for localisation in 24 procedures and 1 procedure, respectively. On histopathological examination, 6 malignant, 10 high-risk and 9 benign lesions were identified. All patients tolerated the procedure well. There were no major complications. CONCLUSION: This is the first report documenting the application of MRI-guided ROLL. Based on our preliminary results, this technique is very efficient and seems to be a good alternative to wire localisation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present an alternative technique for the pre-operative localisation of solely MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions using a computer-assisted MRI-guided radio-guided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) technique. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2010, 25 females with a total of 25 suspicious breast lesions that could be detected only by MRI, and for whom breast surgery was planned, underwent the computer-assisted MRI-guided ROLL technique. A seven-channel biopsy breast array coil and computerised diagnostic workstation were used for the localisation procedure. Three-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced axial images were taken. After investigating the localisation co-ordinates with the help of intervention software on a workstation, an 18 G coaxial cannula was placed in the exact position determined. Following verification of the cannula position by additional axial scans, (99m)Tc-labelled macroalbumin aggregate and MRI contrast material were injected. Post-procedure MRI scans were used to confirm the correct localisation. RESULTS: All the procedures were technically successful. The mean lesion size was 10.8 mm (range: 4-25 mm). The mean total magnet and the mean localisation times were 28.6 min (range: 18-46 min) and 13.1 min (range: 8-20 min), respectively. Grid and pillar methods were used for localisation in 24 procedures and 1 procedure, respectively. On histopathological examination, 6 malignant, 10 high-risk and 9 benign lesions were identified. All patients tolerated the procedure well. There were no major complications. CONCLUSION: This is the first report documenting the application of MRI-guided ROLL. Based on our preliminary results, this technique is very efficient and seems to be a good alternative to wire localisation.
Authors: B L Daniel; R L Birdwell; D M Ikeda; S S Jeffrey; J W Black; W F Block; A M Sawyer-Glover; G H Glover; R J Herfkens Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Laura Liberman; Nanette Bracero; Elizabeth Morris; Cynthia Thornton; D David Dershaw Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Elizabeth A Morris; Laura Liberman; D David Dershaw; Jennifer B Kaplan; Linda R LaTrenta; Andrea F Abramson; Douglas J Ballon Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; Cathleen M Kim; Jennifer B Kaplan; Andrea F Abramson; Jennifer H Menell; Kimberly J Van Zee; D David Dershaw Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C De Cicco; M Pizzamiglio; G Trifirò; A Luini; M Ferrari; G Prisco; V Galimberti; E Cassano; G Viale; M Intra; P Veronesi; G Paganelli Journal: Q J Nucl Med Date: 2002-06
Authors: Yasemin Kayadibi; Fahrettin Kılıç; Ravza Yılmaz; Mehmet Velidedeoğlu; Tülin Öztürk; Deniz Esin Tekcan; Emel Ure Esmerer; Fatih Aydoğan; Mehmet Halit Yılmaz Journal: Eur J Breast Health Date: 2020-12-24
Authors: Marcos Fernando de Lima Docema; Paulo Aguirre Costa; Felipe Eduardo Martins de Andrade; Jose Luiz Barbosa Bevilacqua; Simone Elias; Giovanni Guido Cerri; Alfredo Carlos S D Barros; Afonso Celso Pinto Nazario Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 2.754