Literature DB >> 22009413

Pitfalls of lengthening over an intramedullary nail in tibia: a consecutive case series.

Seung-Ju Kim1, Agashe Mandar, Sang-Heon Song, Hae-Ryong Song.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lengthening over a nail was introduced to reduce the overall complication rate in the classic Ilizarov method. Previous studies reported that an intramedullary nail could decrease the time of external fixation, prevent anatomic malalignment and collapse; Internal friction, damage to endosteal blood supply and infection rates, however, may be higher. Whether the approach achieves it goals with acceptable complication rates is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the results and complications of tibial lengthening over a nail.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients with 80 lengthened tibial segments over an intramedullary nail between 2004 and 2009. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 22 years (range 18-38 years). Functional and psychological outcomes were evaluated using the questionnaires.
RESULTS: The average lengthening achieved was 7.73 cm, 23.5% of initial length. The external fixation index was 1.1 months/cm, and bone-healing index was 1.7 month/cm. The most common complications were valgus angulations of tibia in 20 segments (25%) and equinus contracture in 58 segments (72%). Functional and psychological outcomes were satisfactory after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Lengthening over a nail did not fully prevent axial deviation of regenerate. Equinus contracture was the most common complication but it could be rectified by early intervention such as intramuscular recession or an additional foot frame. Limb lengthening increased functional and psychological outcomes even though there were many complications after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22009413     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1411-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

1.  Clinical implication of sagittal translation in lengthening over nail of tibia.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Keun Jung Ryu; Sang Heon Song; Kwang Won Park; Hae Ryong Song
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-10-25

2.  Complications and functional, psychological outcomes of bilateral tibial lengthening over intramedullary nail: evidence from Vietnam.

Authors:  Luong Nguyen Van; Doan Le Van
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  What risk factors predict usage of gastrocsoleus recession during tibial lengthening?

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Samuel Zonshayn; Saravanaraja Muthusamy; Eugene W Borst; Austin T Fragomen; Joseph T Nguyen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  How should we lengthen post-traumatic limb defects? a systematic review and comparison of motorized lengthening systems, combined internal and external fixation and external fixation alone.

Authors:  Daniel Axelrod; Luc Rubinger; Ajay Shah; Pierre Guy; Herman Johal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-11-22

5.  Does Integrated Fixation Provide Benefit in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Tibial Bone Defects?

Authors:  Mitchell Bernstein; Austin T Fragomen; Samir Sabharwal; Jonathan Barclay; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is there an Increase in Valgus Deviation in Tibial Distraction Using the Lengthening Over Nail Technique?

Authors:  Hoon Park; Keun Jung Ryu; Hyun Woo Kim; Jin Ho Hwang; Joon Woo Han; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Functional outcomes and complications of tibial lengthening using unilateral external fixation and then plating. A prospective case series.

Authors:  Luong Van Nguyen; Doan Van Le
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.