Literature DB >> 22008585

[GESIDA quality care indicators for the care of persons infected by HIV/AIDS].

Miguel Ángel von Wichmann1, Jaime Locutura, José Ramón Blanco, Melchor Riera, Ignacio Suárez-Lozano, Rosa María Saura, Paula Vallejo.   

Abstract

Spain has some tradition of quality assurance systems, although less than in Anglo-Saxon countries. However, there is scarce implantation of these systems in the field of HIV infection. While this scarcity could be explained by the uncertainty surrounding the disease at the beginning of the epidemic, for several years there has been solid scientific evidence on many features of the approach to this disease, established in the various treatment and clinical practice guidelines. Consequently, the AIDS Study Group [Grupo de Estudio del Sida (GESIDA)] designed the present quality of care indicators for persons with HIV/AIDS. The first draft was developed by a committee of health professionals, with the guidance of the Avedis Donebadian University Institute. This draft was then evaluated by a team of external reviewers and posted on the Web page of the Society's web page. Some of the suggestions were included in the final document, with 66 indicators (structure: 5, process: 45, results: 16) in the following areas: structural conditions, diagnosis and evaluation, follow-up and preventive interventions, follow-up of patients under treatment, specific aspects in women, comorbidities, hospitalization, mortality rates, training and research. In each indicator, the sections guaranteeing the indicators' validity and reliability are specified: justification of the indicator as a measure of quality, the healthcare dimension evaluated, mathematical formula, explanation of terms, population, type of indicator (structure, process result), data source, the standard to be achieved and commentaries on the validity of the indicator. Finally, 22 indicators deemed relevant were chosen. GESIDA believes that these indicators should be constantly monitored in all HIV units to identify their results at all times and thus be able to introduce improvement measures.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España S.L. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 22008585     DOI: 10.1016/S0213-005X(10)70048-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin        ISSN: 0213-005X            Impact factor:   1.731


  4 in total

Review 1.  Definition of a core set of quality indicators for the assessment of HIV/AIDS clinical care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emanuel Catumbela; Victor Certal; Alberto Freitas; Carlos Costa; António Sarmento; Altamiro da Costa Pereira
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  [How is HIV disease cared for in a Department of Health?].

Authors:  Francisca Rivera Casares; Soraya González Caminero; Inmaculada Atienza; Nuria Campos; Jesús Navas
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Analysis of adherence to HIV-positive quality of care indicators and their impact on service quality perceptions in patients: a Spanish cross-sectional study.

Authors:  A Gimeno-García; A Franco-Moreno; C Montero-Hernández; S Arponen; E García-Carrasco; B Alejos; D Corps-Fernández; E Gaspar-García; P Galindo-Jara; M García-Navarro; D Varillas-Delgado
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  [Acceptability of the opportunistic search for human immunodeficiency virus infection by serology in patients recruited in Primary Care Centres in Spain].

Authors:  Rafael Carlos Puentes Torres; Cristina Aguado Taberné; Luis Angel Pérula de Torres; José Espejo Espejo; Cristina Castro Fernández; Luís Fransi Galiana
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2016 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 1.137

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.