Literature DB >> 22008256

Strategic promiscuity helps avoid inbreeding at multiple levels in a cooperative breeder where both sexes are philopatric.

Lyanne Brouwer1, Martijn Van De Pol, Els Atema, Andrew Cockburn.   

Abstract

In cooperative breeders, the tension between the opposing forces of kin selection and kin competition is at its most severe. Although philopatry facilitates kin selection, it also increases the risk of inbreeding. When dispersal is limited, extra-pair paternity might be an important mechanism to avoid inbreeding, but evidence for this is equivocal. The red-winged fairy-wren is part of a genus of cooperative breeders with extreme levels of promiscuity and male philopatry, but is unique in that females are also strongly philopatric. Here, we test the hypothesis that promiscuity is an important inbreeding avoidance mechanism when both sexes are philopatric. Levels of extra-pair paternity were substantial (70% of broods), but did not arise through females mating with their helpers, but via extra-group mating. Offspring were more likely to be sired by extra-pair males when the social pair was closely related, and these extra-pair males were genetically less similar to the female than the social male and thus, inbreeding is avoided through extra-pair mating. Females were consistent in their choice of the extra-pair sire over time and preferred early moulting males. Despite neighbouring males often being close kin, they sired 37% of extra-pair offspring. However, females that gained paternity from neighbours were typically less related to them than females that gained paternity further away. Our study is the first to suggest that mating with both closely related social partners and neighbours is avoided. Such sophistication in inbreeding avoidance strategies is remarkable, as the extreme levels of promiscuity imply that social context may provide little cue to relatedness.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22008256     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05325.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  16 in total

1.  Effects of extreme weather on two sympatric Australian passerine bird species.

Authors:  Janet L Gardner; Eleanor Rowley; Perry de Rebeira; Alma de Rebeira; Lyanne Brouwer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cost, risk, and avoidance of inbreeding in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Amy E Leedale; Michelle Simeoni; Stuart P Sharp; Jonathan P Green; Jon Slate; Robert F Lachlan; Elva J H Robinson; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Demographic mechanisms of inbreeding adjustment through extra-pair reproduction.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; A Bradley Duthie; Matthew E Wolak; Peter Arcese
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Neighbouring-group composition and within-group relatedness drive extra-group paternity rate in the European badger (Meles meles).

Authors:  G Annavi; C Newman; H L Dugdale; C D Buesching; Y W Sin; T Burke; D W Macdonald
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Quantifying inbreeding avoidance through extra-pair reproduction.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Peter Arcese; Lukas F Keller; Ryan R Germain; A Bradley Duthie; Sylvain Losdat; Matthew E Wolak; Pirmin Nietlisbach
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Kin discrimination via odour in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose.

Authors:  J Mitchell; S Kyabulima; R Businge; M A Cant; H J Nichols
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Getting fat or getting help? How female mammals cope with energetic constraints on reproduction.

Authors:  Sandra A Heldstab; Carel P van Schaik; Karin Isler
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Low level of extra-pair paternity between nearest neighbors results from female preference for high-quality males in the yellow-rumped flycatcher (Ficedula zanthopygia).

Authors:  Mingju E; Ye Gong; Jiangping Yu; Siyu Zhang; Qianxi Fan; Yunlei Jiang; Haitao Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adjustment of costly extra-group paternity according to inbreeding risk in a cooperative mammal.

Authors:  Hazel J Nichols; Michael A Cant; Jennifer L Sanderson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  When does female multiple mating evolve to adjust inbreeding? Effects of inbreeding depression, direct costs, mating constraints, and polyandry as a threshold trait.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.