Literature DB >> 22008246

Strategy for power calculation for interactions: application to a trial of interventions to improve uptake of bowel cancer screening.

A R Brentnall1, S W Duffy, G Baio, R Raine.   

Abstract

Poorer postcodes within 5 regions in England have a lower response to bowel-cancer screening invitations than do richer postcodes. An extension of the sample-size formula for two proportions is used to determine that needed to detect an increase in response rate that varies by deprivation quintile. The proportions plugged into the formula are weighted averages based on the relationship between response and deprivation; the response rate is adjusted to be constant across deprivation quintiles. From a baseline period between October 2006 and January 2009, detection of an absolute or relative increase of at least 1,2,3,4 and 5% in response rate is required for the richest to poorest quintiles respectively because the interventions were chosen as those most likely to have an effect in the lower socioeconomic groups. A computer simulation experiment shows that the approach is more conservative than a likelihood-ratio calculation, and it appears sensible when compared with repeated application of a two-sample calculation at each quintile.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22008246     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  3 in total

1.  A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; Sue M Moss; Christian von Wagner; Wendy Atkin; Ines Kralj Hans; Rosemary Howe; Francesca Solmi; Stephen Morris; Nicholas Counsell; Allan Hackshaw; Stephen Halloran; Graham Handley; Richard F Logan; Sandra Rainbow; Steve Smith; Julia Snowball; Helen Seaman; Mary Thomas; Samuel G Smith; Lesley M McGregor; Gemma Vart; Jane Wardle; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Jane Wardle; Wendy Atkin; Rosalind Raine; Lesley M McGregor; Gemma Vart; Steve Morris; Stephen W Duffy; Susan Moss; Allan Hackshaw; Stephen Halloran; Ines Kralj-Hans; Rosemary Howe; Julia Snowball; Graham Handley; Richard F Logan; Sandra Rainbow; Steve Smith; Mary Thomas; Nicholas Counsell; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Reducing the Social Gradient in Uptake of the NHS Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Using a Narrative-Based Information Leaflet: A Cluster-Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Lesley M McGregor; Christian von Wagner; Wendy Atkin; Ines Kralj-Hans; Stephen P Halloran; Graham Handley; Richard F Logan; Sandra Rainbow; Steve Smith; Julia Snowball; Mary C Thomas; Samuel G Smith; Gemma Vart; Rosemary Howe; Nicholas Counsell; Allan Hackshaw; Stephen Morris; Stephen W Duffy; Rosalind Raine; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.