Literature DB >> 22008172

Post-prostatectomy image-guided radiation therapy: evaluation of toxicity and inter-fraction variation using online cone-beam CT.

Harriet B Eldredge1, Matthew Studenski, Scott W Keith, Edouard Trabulsi, Costas D Lallas, Leonard G Gomella, Adam P Dicker, Timothy N Showalter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided conformal adjuvant and salvage post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) compared with RT with port films.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients (group 1) were treated with RT following radical prostatectomy (RP) using CBCT-guided conformal RT to a median dose of 68.4Gy. CBCT images were acquired three to five times weekly and were automatically co-registered to a reference CT. A comparative group (group 2) included 150 patients who received post-RP RT with weekly port films to a median dose of 64.8Gy. GU and GI toxicities were graded in both the acute and late settings using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Associations between toxicity and study variables were evaluated by odds ratios (ORs) estimated by logistic regression.
RESULTS: Grades 2 and 3 acute GU toxicity were experienced by 13% (n=9) and 2% (n=1) of patients in group 1, respectively, while 13% (n=19) had grade 2 acute GU toxicity in the control group (group 2). Grade 2 acute GI toxicity was experienced by 13% (n=9) and 15% (n=23) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Acute GU (P=0.67) and GI (P =0.84) toxicities were not significantly different between the two groups. There were no associations detected between CBCT and acute GI toxicity (OR 0.76, P=0.57) or acute GU (OR 1.16, P=0.75). Increased odds of acute GU toxicity were observed for doses>68.4Gy (OR 12.81, P=0.04), which were only delivered in the CBCT group. CBCT mean variations (standard deviation) for 1053 fractions were 2.8mm (2.8), 2.0mm (2.4) and 3.1mm (2.9) in the left-to-right, anterior-to-posterior (AP) and superior-to-inferior (SI) axes, respectively. Corrective shifts for variance≥5mm were required for 15%, 6% and 19% of fractions in the left-to-right, anterior-to-posterior and superior-to-inferior axes, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of acute toxicity with CBCT-guided post-RP RT to 68.4Gy were similar to treatment to 64.8Gy without image-guidance RT. Acceptable early toxicity profiles suggest that CBCT is a reasonable strategy for image guidance, but the value of CBCT must be weighed against potential increased risk of secondary cancers due to increased radiation exposure.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology © 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22008172     DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02305.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  6 in total

Review 1.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part I of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-20

2.  Image-guided, whole-pelvic, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Sang Jun Byun; Young Seok Kim; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Does Interfraction Cone Beam Computed Tomography Improve Target Localization in Prostate Bed Radiotherapy?

Authors:  Sara Elakshar; James Man Git Tsui; Michael Jonathan Kucharczyk; Nada Tomic; Ziad Simon Fawaz; Boris Bahoric; Joseph Papayanatos; Ahmad Chaddad; Tamim Niazi
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

Review 4.  Rationale and development of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy post-prostatectomy: the present standard of care?

Authors:  Julia R Murray; Helen A McNair; David P Dearnaley
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 5.  Gaps between Evidence and Practice in Postoperative Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Focus on Toxicities and the Effects on Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Hamid Raziee; Alejandro Berlin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part II of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.