Literature DB >> 22007256

Pyrolytic Characteristics and Kinetics of Phragmites australis.

Hui Zhao1, Huaxiao Yan, Congwang Zhang, Xiaodong Liu, Yanhui Xue, Yingyun Qiao, Yuanyu Tian, Song Qin.   

Abstract

The pyrolytic kinetics of Phragmites australis was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) method with linear temperature programming process under an inert atmosphere. Kinetic expressions for the degradation rate in devolatilization and combustion steps have been obtained for P. australis with Dollimore method. The values of apparent activation energy, the most probable mechanism functions, and the corresponding preexponential factor were determined. The results show that the model agrees well with the experimental data and provide useful information for the design of pyrolytic processing system using P. australis as feedstock to produce biofuel.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22007256      PMCID: PMC3189580          DOI: 10.1155/2011/408973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med        ISSN: 1741-427X            Impact factor:   2.629


1. Introduction

The common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. exSteud., described as one of the most widely distributed angiosperms [1, 2] is commonly found in freshwater and marine wetlands and along the upland edge of tidal marshes. P. australis has increased in proportion in both tidal and nontidal wetlands in North America and has become a major concern to wetland ecologists [3, 4]. Expansion of P. australis into salt marshes reportedly caused a fivefold decrease in plant species richness [5], reductions in microtopography [6, 7], and reductions in biodiversity [3]. P. australis is actively colonizing wetlands raising concern about loss of biodiversity [8, 9]. In addition, the alternative source of energy contributes to the reduction of CO2 emissions since the same amount of CO2 is extracted from the air during the growth period of the plants [10]. P. australis seems to be especially a promising energy plant and chemical feedstock due to its high production potential. Various processes have been proposed for the integrated utilization of these powerful plants [11, 12]. The common reed can provide a large quantity of biomass and annual yields of 40–63 tons per hectare have been reported. P. australis is becoming very important as stable biomass source for China with its natural huge reserves and increasing artificial cultivation. Pyrolysis is an effective method to harvest the energy in P. australis. However, pyrolytic characteristics studies of P. australis are little, which has led to the production of biofuel being far from commercialization. Both the development of the pyrolytic process and reactor design require complete elucidation of the pyrolytic mechanism. Therefore, the pyrolytic mechanisms of P. australis should be studied. The specific objective of the present work was to study the pyrolytic characteristics of P. australis using a TG/DSC instrument. The kinetic parameters of decomposition were then obtained and the pyrolytic mechanism was illustrated, which can provide useful information for the design of pyrolysis system using P. australis biomass as feedstock to produce bio-fuel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

P. australis samples were harvested from a wetland beside the campus of Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, September 2010.

2.2. Analysis of P. australis Samples

Samples were ground into fine powders and sieved to less than 0.147 mm. Proximate and ultimate analyses were carried out to characterize P. australis samples according to national standard GB212-91 (China) and element analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH vario EL cube), respectively. In addition, cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin contents were analyzed according to methods from the literature [13]. The results were summarized in Table 1. All tests were carried out in triplicate.
Table 1

Proximate analysis, ultimate analysis, and component analysis of P. australis (/%wt).

Parameter P. australis
Proximate analysis a (wt.%, ad. Basis)
 Moisture 5.89 ± 0.03
 Ash 12.32 ± 1.12
 Volatile matter 70.01 ± 2.40
 Fix carbonc 11.78
Ultimate analysis b (wt.%, daf. Basis)
 Carbon 42.78 ± 1.53
 Hydrogen 5.17 ± 0.02
 Oxygenc 50.511
 Nitrogen 1.31 ± 0.02
 Sulfur 0.229 ± 0.01
 C/H 8.31 ± 0.31
 C/N 32.57 ± 1.55
Component analysis (wt.%, daf. Basis)
 Hemicellulose 30.68 ± 3.15
 Lignin 20.34 ± 1.56
 Cellulose 43.05 ± 3.98

aDry-free basis; bDry ash-free basis;  cCalculated by difference.

2.3. Pyrolysis of the Samples

Thermogravimetric analyses were carried out using a thermal analyzer (TGA/DSC1/1600LF, METTLER TOLEDO Co., Switzerland). 10 mg of initial sample was pyrolyzed under a nitrogen flow rate of 50 cm3/min with a heating rate of 25°C/min. The weight loss and calorific changes in response to temperature were then recorded and used to plot the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), derivative thermogravimetric analysis (DTG), and differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) curves. All experiments were replicated three times.

2.4. The Kinetic Parameters of the Samples

where is the conversion rate and is defined as κ is the velocity constant, and f(α) is the mechanism function with different relative coefficient where is the heating rate and T is the initial temperature. The reaction rate constant, κ, can be described by the following expression: By separation of variables and integration, The expression of G(α) corresponding to each one of the mechanisms considered is also shown in Table 2
Table 2

Algebraic expressions of functions G(α) and f(α) and mechanisms [23, 24].

No. G(a) f(α)  Rate-determining mechanism
11 − (1−α)2/3 3/2(1−α)1/3 Chemical reaction
21 − (1−α)1/4 4(1−α)3/4 Chemical reaction
3(1−α)−1/2 − 12(1−α)3/2 Chemical reaction
4(1−α)−1 − 1(1−α)2 Chemical reaction
5(1−α)2 − 11/2(1−α)3 Chemical reaction
6(1−α)3 − 11/3(1−α)4 Chemical reaction
71 − (1−α)2 1/2(1 − α)Chemical reaction
81 − (1−α)3 1/3(1−α)2 Chemical reaction
91 − (1−α)4 1/4(1−α)3 Chemical reaction
10 α 3/2 2/3α −1/2 Nucleation
11 α 1/2 2α 1/2 Nucleation
12 α 1/3 3α 2/3 Nucleation
13 α 1/4 4α 3/4 Nucleation
14 ln a α Nucleation
15ln(1 − α)1 − α Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
16[−ln(1−α)]2/3 3/2(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]1/3 Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
17[−ln(1−α)]1/2 2(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]1/2 Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
18[−ln(1−α)]1/3 3(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]2/3 Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
19[−ln(1−α)]1/4 4(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]3/4 Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
20[−ln(1−α)]2 1/2(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]−1 Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
21[−ln(1−α)]3 1/3(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]−2 Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
22[−ln(1−α)]4 1/4(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]−3 Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth
23 ln a/(1 − α) a/(1 − a)Branching nuclei
24 α (1−a)0 Contracting disk
251 − (1−α)1/2 2(1−a)1/2 Contracting cylinder (cylindrical symmetry)
261 − (1−α)1/3 3(1−a)2/3 Contracting sphere (spherical symmetry)
27 α 2 1/(2a)One-dimensional diffusion
28[1−(1−α)1/2]1/2 4{(1−α)[1−  (1−α)]1/2}1/2 Two-dimensional diffusion
29 a + (1 − α)ln(1 − α)[−ln(1−α)]−1 Two-dimensional diffusion
30[1−  (1−α)1/3]2 (3/2)(1−α)2/3[1−  (1−α)1/3]−1 Three-dimensional diffusion, spherical symmetry
311 − 2/3α − (1−α)2/3 (3/2)[(1−αa)−1/3−1]−1 Three-dimensional diffusion, cylindrical symmetry
32[(1−α)  −1/3  −1]2 (3/2)(1−α)4/3[(1−α)−1/3−1]−1 Three-dimensional diffusion
33[(1+α)1/3  −1]2 (3/2)(1+α)2/3[(1+α)1/3−1]−1 Three-dimensional diffusion
341 + 2/3α − (1+  α)2/3 (3/2)[(1+α)−1/3−1]−1 Three-dimensional diffusion
35[(1+α)−1/3−1]2 (3/2)(1 + α)4/3[(1  +α)−1/3−1]−1 Three-dimensional diffusion
36[1−  (1−α)1/3]1/2 6(1 − α)2/3[1−  (1−α)1/3]1/2 Three-dimensional diffusion
This equation is used to estimate the most correct reaction mechanism function G(α). According to the plotting lgG(αi) versus lgTi and a linear regression, if the mechanism studied conforms to certain G(α) function, the slope of the straight line should be equal to −1.00000 and the linear correlation coefficient R is high Both of (5) and (6) are called Harcourt-Fission model of integral. m and B were constructed with deducing coefficients of least-square method With a given value of lgTi, the constants C, m, lgκ   can be determined Substituting the value of ln κ back into (9) in conjunction with 1/T allows lnA and E to be calculated [14]. All plots were generated and the lines were fitted using the Origin 8.0 software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Materials

The results of proximate, ultimate, and component analysis of P. australis samples are summarized in Table 1, which is in the same order of magnitude as energy crops. The comparison with other terrestrial materials shows a higher amount of ash and cellulose. The volatile matter and lignin contents of P. australis are lower, respectively, while the sulfur content of the samples is approximately equal [15].

3.2. Characteristics of the Thermal Degradation Process

Three stages in the pyrolytic process of P. australis are in accordance with the conclusion of oxidative pyrolysis curves of energy crops followed the usual shape for lignocellulosic materials [16-19]. The first stage (I) occurred as the temperature increased from 50 to 240°C, losing cellular water and the external water bound by surface tension. While the second stage (II), occurring as the temperature increased from 240 to 500°C was the devolatilization stage, during which the main pyrolytic process occurred and most of the organic materials are decomposed accompanied by various volatile components released gradually, resulting in a large weight loss which is more than 50% of total volatiles and formation of the main pyrolytic production. Specifically, stage II was composed of two zones for P. australis due to the different thermal stability of the components with zone I occurring as the temperature increased from 240 to 318°C which is a strong peak in the rate of weight loss curve, at which the rate of weight loss attains maximum with a maximum weight loss point at 288°C and zone II occurred as the temperature increased from 318 to 500°C with a maximum weight loss point at 346°C. The third stage (III) occurred as the temperature increased from 500 to 800°C with the residuals, the carbonaceous matters in the solid, slowly decomposed, resulting in the formation of a loose porous residual. A slight continued loss of weight is shown in the weight loss curve. P. australis is composed of many polysaccharides that have low polymerization. Moreover, the inorganic salts in P. australis presented a catalytic effect [20]. These findings indicate that the beginning of the decomposition occurs at a higher temperature for the samples evaluated in this study than for other terrestrial biomass with a high content of cellulose (straws and grasses) or lignin (woody biomass). The weight losses of P. australis during stage I are primarily due to the loss of moisture and are similar to the moisture content values reported in Table 1. The instantaneous maximum reaction rate occurred in zone I of stage II. There was an endothermic peak during stage I that corresponded with the moisture evaporation procedure. As the temperature increased, an exothermic effect appeared during stage II and exothermic peaks were observed at 5–15°C after the maximum weight loss point. These findings indicate that the devolatilization stage (stage II) produced heat. Specifically, there was an endothermic effect during stage III. These findings indicate that the carbonaceous residual may have been decomposed at temperatures above 600°C. A maximum exothermic peak corresponding to the maximum weight loss rate peak appeared on the DSC curve of the samples (stage II). These findings indicate that the main pyrolysis process of the samples is an exothermic process. The exothermic effect was due to the charring process, which is the decomposition of the inorganic materials to metal carbonate (Figures 1, 2, and 3) [21, 22].
Figure 1

TG-DTG curves of P. australis.

Figure 2

DSC curves of

Figure 3

Plot for determination of most probable mechanism functions.

3.3. Kinetic Analysis of the Pyrolysis Process

The most probable mechanism function with integral form can be expressed by  G(α 3) = (1−α)1/2 − 1, and the results calculated according to the above equations are as follows: lgB = −116.34877, m = 41.18814, and lgC = −113.32564. The result indicates that the model is in good agreement with the experimental data (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Plot for determination of E and A(ln A  = 25.14 min−1, E = 162.66 kJ mol−1, R  = 0.9999).

Comparisons of the decomposition temperature and activation energy of several types of biomass are provided in Table 3 [17]. The results indicate that the decomposition temperature of P. australis is lower than that of several kinds of plants and single component of biomass.
Table 3

Comparison of various kinetic parameters of pyrolysis for different biomass[17, 25].

SamplesDecomposition temperature (°C)Activation energy (kJ mol−1)
Cellulose300–430200
Hemicellulose250–350100
Lignin250–55080
Chitosan268–31295.6–185.7
Enteromorpha prolifera 174–551228.1
spirulina platensis 190–56076.2–97
Chlorella protothecoides 150–54042.2–52.5
Dunaliella tertiolecta 155–299145.713–146.421
Oak tree230–400236.2
Corn stover250–47057.95–58.94
Peat208–33452.77
P. australis 240–500163

4. Conclusions

High priority should be given to the development and protection of biomass pyrolysis which is widely recognized as a technically and economically feasible way. This study presents useful information for the design of a pyrolytic processing system using P. australis biomass. There were three stages in the pyrolytic process of the samples. The second stage is the main pyrolysis process and most of the organic materials are decomposed in this stage which is our study focused on. Iterative isoconversional procedure has been applied to estimate the values of apparent activation energy. The method of Dollimore combined with 36 mechanism functions is used to define the most probable mechanism G(α 3) = (1 − α)−1/2 − 1; the preexponential factor A = 8.28 × 1010 min−1 and E = 1.63 × 105 J mol−1 are obtained on the basis of G(α). Comparisons of various kinetic parameters of pyrolysis for different biomass types show that P. australis biomass has a great potential and a good prospect for producing biofuel by fast pyrolysis process. To learn more about P. australis pyrolysis, characterization of liquid and solid products should be more in-depth understood [26, 27].
  6 in total

1.  Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh landscapes.

Authors:  Mark D Bertness; Patrick J Ewanchuk; Brian Reed Silliman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Uncertainties in the role of land vegetation in the carbon cycle.

Authors:  J M Adams; G Piovesan
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Classification of macroalgae as fuel and its thermochemical behaviour.

Authors:  A B Ross; J M Jones; M L Kubacki; T Bridgeman
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Pyrolytic characteristics and kinetics of two brown algae and sodium alginate.

Authors:  Demao Li; Limei Chen; Xiujie Yi; Xiaowen Zhang; Naihao Ye
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Thermogravimetric analysis and emission characteristics of two energy crops in air atmosphere: Arundo donax and Miscanthus giganthus.

Authors:  Mejdi Jeguirim; Sophie Dorge; Gwenaelle Trouvé
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of the marine microalgae Dunaliella tertiolecta using thermogravimetric analyzer.

Authors:  Zou Shuping; Wu Yulong; Yang Mingde; Li Chun; Tong Junmao
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 9.642

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.