OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a school nurse-delivered smoking-cessation intervention in increasing abstinence among adolescent smokers. METHODS:Thirty-five high schools were pair-matched and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 conditions, each of which consisted of 4 visits with the school nurse: (1) counseling intervention using the 5 A's model and cognitive-behavioral techniques; or (2) an information-attention control condition. Adolescents (n = 1068) who reported past 30-day smoking and interest in quitting completed surveys at baseline and at 3 and 12 months and provided saliva samples for biochemical validation of reported smoking abstinence. RESULTS: Intervention condition participants were almost twice as likely to be abstinent per self-report at 3 months (odds ratio: 1.90 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-3.24]; P = .017) compared with control participants; at 12 months there were no differences. The difference at 3 months was driven by quit rates in male students (15.0% [intervention] vs 4.9% [control]; odds ratio: 3.23 [95% confidence interval: 1.63-6.43]; P = .001); there was no intervention effect in female students at either time point (6.6% vs 7.0% at 3 months and 16.6% vs 15.5% at 12 months) and no intervention effect in male students at 12 months (13.9% vs 13.2%). Smoking amount and frequency decreased significantly in intervention compared with control schools at 3 but not at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A school nurse-delivered smoking-cessation intervention proved feasible and effective in improving short-term abstinence among adolescent boys and short-term reductions in smoking amount and frequency in both genders. Additional research is needed to enhance both cessation and maintained abstinence.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a school nurse-delivered smoking-cessation intervention in increasing abstinence among adolescent smokers. METHODS: Thirty-five high schools were pair-matched and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 conditions, each of which consisted of 4 visits with the school nurse: (1) counseling intervention using the 5 A's model and cognitive-behavioral techniques; or (2) an information-attention control condition. Adolescents (n = 1068) who reported past 30-day smoking and interest in quitting completed surveys at baseline and at 3 and 12 months and provided saliva samples for biochemical validation of reported smoking abstinence. RESULTS: Intervention condition participants were almost twice as likely to be abstinent per self-report at 3 months (odds ratio: 1.90 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-3.24]; P = .017) compared with control participants; at 12 months there were no differences. The difference at 3 months was driven by quit rates in male students (15.0% [intervention] vs 4.9% [control]; odds ratio: 3.23 [95% confidence interval: 1.63-6.43]; P = .001); there was no intervention effect in female students at either time point (6.6% vs 7.0% at 3 months and 16.6% vs 15.5% at 12 months) and no intervention effect in male students at 12 months (13.9% vs 13.2%). Smoking amount and frequency decreased significantly in intervention compared with control schools at 3 but not at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A school nurse-delivered smoking-cessation intervention proved feasible and effective in improving short-term abstinence among adolescent boys and short-term reductions in smoking amount and frequency in both genders. Additional research is needed to enhance both cessation and maintained abstinence.
Authors: Robin Mermelstein; Suzanne M Colby; Christi Patten; Alexander Prokhorov; Richard Brown; Mark Myers; William Adelman; Karen Hudmon; Paul McDonald Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: G Grimshaw; A Stanton; C Blackburn; K Andrews; C Grimshaw; Y Vinogradova; W Robertson Journal: Child Care Health Dev Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 2.508
Authors: Cathy L Backinger; Paul McDonald; Deborah J Ossip-Klein; Suzanne M Colby; Catherine O Maule; Pebbles Fagan; Corinne Husten; Brian Colwell Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2003
Authors: Lori Pbert; Michelle Trivedi; Susan Druker; Jennifer Bram; Barbara Olendzki; Sybil Crawford; Christine Frisard; Victoria Andersen; Molly E Waring; Karen Clements; Kristin Schneider; Alan C Geller Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Thomas R Fanshawe; William Halliwell; Nicola Lindson; Paul Aveyard; Jonathan Livingstone-Banks; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-11-17
Authors: Jennifer K Carroll; Paul C Winters; Mechelle R Sanders; Francesca Decker; Thanh Ngo; Christopher N Sciamanna Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Sukaina Alzyoud; Khalid A Kheirallah; Linda S Weglicki; Kenneth D Ward; Abdallah Al-Khawaldeh; Ali Shotar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Heather Griffis; Meredith Matone; Katherine Kellom; Erica Concors; William Quarshie; Benjamin French; David Rubin; Peter F Cronholm Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.295