Literature DB >> 22006510

Developmental toxicology: new directions workshop: refining testing strategies and study designs.

Kimberly C Brannen1, Suzanne E Fenton, Deborah K Hansen, Wafa Harrouk, James H Kim, Dana Shuey.   

Abstract

In April 2009, the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's (HESI) Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology Technical Committee held a two-day workshop entitled "Developmental Toxicology-New Directions." The third session of the workshop focused on ways to refine animal studies to improve relevance and predictivity for human risk. The session included five presentations on: (1) considerations for refining developmental toxicology testing and data interpretation; (2) comparative embryology and considerations in study design and interpretation; (3) pharmacokinetic considerations in study design; (4) utility of genetically modified models for understanding mode-of-action; and (5) special considerations in reproductive testing for biologics. The presentations were followed by discussion by the presenters and attendees. Much of the discussion focused on aspects of refining current animal testing strategies, including use of toxicokinetic data, dose selection, tiered/triggered testing strategies, species selection, and use of alternative animal models. Another major area of discussion was use of non-animal-based testing paradigms, including how to define a "signal" or adverse effect, translating in vitro exposures to whole animal and human exposures, validation strategies, the need to bridge the existing gap between classical toxicology testing and risk assessment, and development of new technologies. Although there was general agreement among participants that the current testing strategy is effective, there was also consensus that traditional methods are resource-intensive and improved effectiveness of developmental toxicity testing to assess risks to human health is possible. This article provides a summary of the session's presentations and discussion and describes some key areas that warrant further consideration.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22006510      PMCID: PMC3462002          DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.20326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 1542-9733


  8 in total

Review 1.  A tiered approach to life stages testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment.

Authors:  Ralph L Cooper; James C Lamb; Sue M Barlow; Karin Bentley; Angela M Brady; Nancy G Doerrer; David L Eisenbrandt; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; Ronald N Hines; Lorraine F H Irvine; Carole A Kimmel; Herman Koeter; Abby A Li; Susan L Makris; Larry P Sheets; Gerrit Speijers; Karen E Whitby
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  David J Dix; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Ann M Richard; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert J Kavlock
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Activation of mouse and human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (alpha, beta/delta, gamma) by perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate.

Authors:  Margy L Takacs; Barbara D Abbott
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  ILSI/HESI maternal toxicity workshop summary: maternal toxicity and its impact on study design and data interpretation.

Authors:  Bruce K Beyer; Neil Chernoff; Bengt R Danielsson; Karen Davis-Bruno; Wafa Harrouk; Ronald D Hood; Gemma Janer; Ulla Wändel Liminga; James H Kim; Meredith Rocca; John Rogers; Anthony R Scialli
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2010-12-23

5.  Different embryo-fetal toxicity effects for three VLA-4 antagonists.

Authors:  F Crofts; M Pino; B DeLise; P Guittin; S Barbellion; P Brunel; S Potdevin; B Bergmann; T Hofmann; S Lerman; R L Clark
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2004-04

6.  Developmental toxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is not dependent on expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha (PPAR alpha) in the mouse.

Authors:  Barbara D Abbott; Cynthia J Wolf; Kaberi P Das; Robert D Zehr; Judith E Schmid; Andrew B Lindstrom; Mark J Strynar; Christopher Lau
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Modeling single and repeated dose pharmacokinetics of PFOA in mice.

Authors:  Inchio Lou; John F Wambaugh; Christopher Lau; Roger G Hanson; Andrew B Lindstrom; Mark J Strynar; R Dan Zehr; R Woodrow Setzer; Hugh A Barton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Cell adhesion events mediated by alpha 4 integrins are essential in placental and cardiac development.

Authors:  J T Yang; H Rayburn; R O Hynes
Journal:  Development       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.868

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Non-clinical considerations for supporting accelerated inclusion of pregnant women in pre-licensure clinical trials with anti-HIV agents.

Authors:  Rick Greupink; Hedwig van Hove; Felix Mhlanga; Peter Theunissen; Angela Colbers
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 6.707

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.