PURPOSE: We compared colonic methanogenesis in vivo and in vitro as well as fecal pH in healthy subjects and in patients with resected colorectal cancer thus without the possible confounding effects of the tumor. METHODS: A total of 144 subjects, 96 with resected colorectal cancer (of whom, 48 were with metastatic disease), 48 healthy subjects with intact colon, were analyzed for breath methane, fecal methanogenesis in vitro and fecal pH. In addition, the association between methanogenesis and pH with cancer site, operation technique and abdominal discomfort was investigated. RESULTS: In vivo and in vitro methane measurements were in agreement. The percentage of breath methane excretors and fecal pH did not significantly differ in participants resected for colorectal cancer, either with (46%, 6.76) or without (46%, 6.77) metastatic disease, from healthy participants (40%, 6.80). Breath methane excretors had higher fecal pH than nonexcretors (7.05 versus 6.57, P< 0.001) and less abdominal discomfort (30% versus 54%, P = 0.016). Among patients with resected right-sided cancer (n = 15), there were less breath methane excretors (20%) than among those with resected left-sided cancer (51%, n = 81, P = 0.029) as well as lower fecal pH than among those with resected left-sided cancer (6.27 versus 6.86, P = 0.002) and among healthy subjects (6.80, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with resected colorectal cancer were as frequently methane producers as healthy subjects with intact colon, and there was no difference in their fecal pH. Low methanogenesis was found in patients with abdominal discomfort and is a possible characteristic, along with low fecal pH, to right-sided colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: We compared colonic methanogenesis in vivo and in vitro as well as fecal pH in healthy subjects and in patients with resected colorectal cancer thus without the possible confounding effects of the tumor. METHODS: A total of 144 subjects, 96 with resected colorectal cancer (of whom, 48 were with metastatic disease), 48 healthy subjects with intact colon, were analyzed for breath methane, fecal methanogenesis in vitro and fecal pH. In addition, the association between methanogenesis and pH with cancer site, operation technique and abdominal discomfort was investigated. RESULTS: In vivo and in vitro methane measurements were in agreement. The percentage of breath methane excretors and fecal pH did not significantly differ in participants resected for colorectal cancer, either with (46%, 6.76) or without (46%, 6.77) metastatic disease, from healthy participants (40%, 6.80). Breath methane excretors had higher fecal pH than nonexcretors (7.05 versus 6.57, P< 0.001) and less abdominal discomfort (30% versus 54%, P = 0.016). Among patients with resected right-sided cancer (n = 15), there were less breath methane excretors (20%) than among those with resected left-sided cancer (51%, n = 81, P = 0.029) as well as lower fecal pH than among those with resected left-sided cancer (6.27 versus 6.86, P = 0.002) and among healthy subjects (6.80, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with resected colorectal cancer were as frequently methane producers as healthy subjects with intact colon, and there was no difference in their fecal pH. Low methanogenesis was found in patients with abdominal discomfort and is a possible characteristic, along with low fecal pH, to right-sided colorectal cancer.
Authors: Daniel Scharlau; Anke Borowicki; Nina Habermann; Thomas Hofmann; Stefanie Klenow; Claudia Miene; Umang Munjal; Katrin Stein; Michael Glei Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2009-04-19 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: L Mira-Pascual; R Cabrera-Rubio; S Ocon; P Costales; A Parra; A Suarez; F Moris; L Rodrigo; A Mira; M C Collado Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 7.527
Authors: Karolina Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka; Agnieszka Daca; Mateusz Fic; Thierry van de Wetering; Marcin Folwarski; Wojciech Makarewicz Journal: Gut Microbes Date: 2020-05-26
Authors: Barbora Pavlatovská; Markéta Machálková; Petra Brisudová; Adam Pruška; Karel Štěpka; Jan Michálek; Tereza Nečasová; Petr Beneš; Jan Šmarda; Jan Preisler; Michal Kozubek; Jarmila Navrátilová Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Nuwan Dharmawardana; Thomas Goddard; Charmaine Woods; David I Watson; Ross Butler; Eng H Ooi; Roger Yazbeck Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 4.379