Literature DB >> 22006400

Identification and correction of spectral contamination in 2H/1H and 18O/16O measured in leaf, stem, and soil water.

Natalie M Schultz1, Timothy J Griffis, Xuhui Lee, John M Baker.   

Abstract

Plant water extracts typically contain organic materials that may cause spectral interference when using isotope ratio infrared spectroscopy (IRIS), resulting in errors in the measured isotope ratios. Manufacturers of IRIS instruments have developed post-processing software to identify the degree of contamination in water samples, and potentially correct the isotope ratios of water with known contaminants. Here, the correction method proposed by an IRIS manufacturer, Los Gatos Research, Inc., was employed and the results were compared with those obtained from isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). Deionized water was spiked with methanol and ethanol to create correction curves for δ(18)O and δ(2)H. The contamination effects of different sample types (leaf, stem, soil) and different species from agricultural fields, grasslands, and forests were compared. The average corrections in leaf samples ranged from 0.35 to 15.73‰ for δ(2)H and 0.28 to 9.27‰ for δ(18)O. The average corrections in stem samples ranged from 1.17 to 13.70‰ for δ(2)H and 0.47 to 7.97‰ for δ(18)O. There was no contamination observed in soil water. Cleaning plant samples with activated charcoal had minimal effects on the degree of spectral contamination, reducing the corrections, by on average, 0.44‰ for δ(2)H and 0.25‰ for δ(18)O. The correction method eliminated the discrepancies between IRMS and IRIS for δ(18)O, and greatly reduced the discrepancies for δ(2)H. The mean differences in isotope ratios between IRMS and the corrected IRIS method were 0.18‰ for δ(18)O, and -3.39‰ for δ(2)H. The inability to create an ethanol correction curve for δ(2)H probably caused the larger discrepancies. We conclude that ethanol and methanol are the primary compounds causing interference in IRIS analyzers, and that each individual analyzer will probably require customized correction curves.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22006400     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.5236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  4 in total

1.  Direct analysis of δ2H and δ18O in natural and enriched human urine using laser-based, off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy.

Authors:  Elena S F Berman; Susan L Fortson; Steven P Snaith; Manish Gupta; Douglas S Baer; Isabelle Chery; Stephane Blanc; Edward L Melanson; Peter J Thomson; John R Speakman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Irrigation depth far exceeds water uptake depth in an oasis cropland in the middle reaches of Heihe River Basin.

Authors:  Bin Yang; Xuefa Wen; Xiaomin Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Water Uptake Tradeoffs of Dominant Shrub Species in the Coastal Wetlands of the Yellow River Delta, China.

Authors:  Jinfang Zhu; Jingtao Liu; Junsheng Li; Caiyun Zhao; Jingkuan Sun
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Halophytes Differ in Their Adaptation to Soil Environment in the Yellow River Delta: Effects of Water Source, Soil Depth, and Nutrient Stoichiometry.

Authors:  Tian Li; Jingkuan Sun; Zhanyong Fu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.