Literature DB >> 22006168

Forearm bone mineral density and incidence of hip fractures in Swedish urban and rural men 1987-2002.

Björn E Rosengren1, Henrik G Ahlborg, Per Gärdsell, Ingemar Sernbo, Jan-Åke Nilsson, Robin M Daly, Magnus K Karlsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the recently described break in the trend in hip fracture incidence in many settings applies in both women and men, depends on changes in bone mineral density (BMD) or changes in other risk factors, or whether it is apparent in both urban and rural settings.
METHODS: We evaluated changes in annual hip fracture incidence from 1987 to 2002 in Swedish men aged ≥60 years in one urban (n = 25,491) and one rural population (n = 16,432) and also secular differences in BMD, measured by single-photon absorptiometry at the distal radius and multiple other risk factors for hip fracture in a population-based sub-sample of the urban and the rural men aged 60-80 years in 1988/89 (n = 202 vs. 121) and in 1998/99 (n = 79 vs. 69).
RESULTS: No statistically significant changes in the annual age-adjusted hip fracture incidence per 10,000 were apparent from 1987 to 2002 in urban (0.38 per year, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.88) or rural men (-0.05 per year, 95% CI -0.63 to 0.53). BMD was similar in 1988/89 and 1998/99 when examining both urban (-19.6 mg/cm(2), 95% CI -42.6 to 3.5) and rural (-23.0 mg/cm(2), 95% CI -52.1 to 6.1) men.
CONCLUSIONS: Since no secular change in age-adjusted hip fracture incidence was found during the study period, a levelling off in hip fracture incidence is present also in Swedish men. Because BMD on a group level was similar in 1988/89 and 1998/99, changes in other risk factors ought to be either of minor importance or counteracted by changes in different risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22006168     DOI: 10.1177/1403494811425604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  6 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms linking air pollution and bone damage.

Authors:  Diddier Prada; Gerard López; Helena Solleiro-Villavicencio; Claudia Garcia-Cuellar; Andrea A Baccarelli
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Epidemiology of fractures in the United Kingdom 1988-2012: Variation with age, sex, geography, ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Robert van der Velde; Rebecca J Moon; Joop P W van den Bergh; Piet Geusens; Frank de Vries; Tjeerd P van Staa; Cyrus Cooper; Nicholas C Harvey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Comparison of Bone Mineral Density between Urban and Rural Areas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mika Matsuzaki; Rashmi Pant; Bharati Kulkarni; Sanjay Kinra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Recent hip fracture trends in Sweden and Denmark with age-period-cohort effects.

Authors:  B E Rosengren; J Björk; C Cooper; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Epidemiology and time trends of distal forearm fractures in adults - a study of 11.2 million person-years in Sweden.

Authors:  Daniel Jerrhag; Martin Englund; Magnus K Karlsson; Bjorn E Rosengren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Quantitative modelling of hip fracture trends in 14 European countries: testing variations of a shared reversal over time.

Authors:  Raquel Lucas; Ana Martins; Milton Severo; Poliana Silva; Teresa Monjardino; Ana Rita Gaio; Cyrus Cooper; Henrique Barros
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.