Literature DB >> 22005394

Manipulations of attention enhance self-regulation.

Asma Hanif1, Anne E Ferrey, Alexandra Frischen, Kathryn Pozzobon, John D Eastwood, Daniel Smilek, Mark J Fenske.   

Abstract

Successful goal-directed behavior requires self-regulation to override competing impulses. Emerging evidence suggests that attention may mediate such acts, but little is known about the specific operations through which attention might influence self-regulation. Here we test this often-implicit assumption by manipulating attention mechanisms in two ways: one controlling the inhibition of inappropriate responses; the other controlling the breadth of attention. Participants significantly improved their performance on a self-regulation task after practice on a response inhibition task (Experiment 1) and after the induction of a broad focus of attention in a visual discrimination task (Experiment 2). We propose that such manipulations enhance self-regulation by engaging mechanisms that enhance the salience of goal-related representations and reduce the activation of competing goal-irrelevant neural representations. By more efficiently resolving conflict among the signals vying to drive behavior, pre-engaging attention may also help to conserve resources needed for continued self-regulation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22005394     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  9 in total

1.  Internet-word compared with daily-word priming reduces attentional scope.

Authors:  Ming Peng; Libin Zhang; Yiran Wen; Qingbai Zhao
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Heavy drinking and the role of inhibitory control of attention.

Authors:  Walter Roberts; Melissa A Miller; Jessica Weafer; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Digital media use in the 2 h before bedtime is associated with sleep variables in university students.

Authors:  Kathryn M Orzech; Michael A Grandner; Brandy M Roane; Mary A Carskadon
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2015-09-14

4.  Can training change attentional breadth? Failure to find transfer effects.

Authors:  Lin Fang; Kristof Hoorelbeke; Lynn Bruyneel; Lies Notebaert; Colin MacLeod; Rudi De Raedt; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-26

Review 5.  An attentional scope model of rumination.

Authors:  Anson J Whitmer; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 6.  Cognitive control in the self-regulation of physical activity and sedentary behavior.

Authors:  Jude Buckley; Jason D Cohen; Arthur F Kramer; Edward McAuley; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Executive attention deficits after traumatic brain injury reflect impaired recruitment of resources.

Authors:  Sudhin A Shah; Yelena Goldin; Mary M Conte; Andrew M Goldfine; Maliheh Mohamadpour; Brian C Fidali; Keith Cicerone; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Cognitive function of older adults engaging in physical activity.

Authors:  Monisha Ingold; Nikki Tulliani; Chetwyn C H Chan; Karen P Y Liu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Lost in the forest, stuck in the trees: dispositional global/local bias is resistant to exposure to high and low spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.